Part Two:
Crete aligned with Egypt
“The wealth of pottery, sculpture and
jewellery that has been found in Crete was
so old that no one could accurately date it,
according to Professor [Stylianos] Alexiou.
So many Minoan artefacts are in Egypt that
experts are best able to date Cretan finds
by comparing them to Egyptian ones, whose
chronology is better understood”.
Gavin
Menzies
Gavin Menzies (The Lost Empire of Atlantis: History's Greatest Mystery Revealed (HarperCollins,
2011), writing of the “highly prized”, distinctive Cretan pottery (pp. 41-44),
will tell of how Egyptian chronology is the yardstick for dating Cretan pottery:
The pottery
told us loud and clearly that the Minoans [sic] had traded much more than
foodstuffs and olive oil. The Kamares designs are dramatic, a modern-looking
black and red, and the pottery was first excavated here [Kamares cave] in the
early 1900’s.
I’d learned by
now it had been highly prized across the entire Mediterranean. It has been
found across the Levant and Mesopotamia, from Hazor and Ashkelon in Israel to Beirut
and Byblos in Lebanon and the ancient Canaanite city of Ugarit, near what is now
the sea-town of Ras-Shamra in modern-day Syria. Judging by the finds in
Egyptian tombs and elsewhere across the region, the Minoan skill in art seems
to have given the Minoans of ancient Crete a free pass to the glamour, science
and civilisation of the two most advanced cultures of the Early Bronze Age,
Mesopotamia and Egypt.
In the 14th
century B.C., said Professor [Stylianos] Alexiou, the bounty of Crete – its
skilled metal-work, olive oil, pottery, saffron and so on – was exchanged as
gifts between Mediterranean rulers. In return, the Egyptians sent exotica:
gold, ivory, cloth and stone vessels containing perfumes.
The wealth of
pottery, sculpture and jewellery that has been found in Crete was so old that
no one could accurately date it, according to Professor Alexiou. So many Minoan
artefacts are in Egypt that experts are best able to date Cretan finds by
comparing them to Egyptian ones, whose chronology is better understood.
Damien Mackey’s
comment: Whilst the following quote from professor Alexiou will show how the
successive palatial periods of Cretan history are to be aligned with Egypt, on
the basis of pottery finds, the problem is that Egyptian dynastic history
itself has not been properly dated, meaning that, for instance, Cretan pottery
synchronous with the era of pharaoh Thutmose [Thutmosis] III of 18th
dynasty Egypt, i.e., Neo-Palatial Cretan, will be dated about 500 years earlier
than it should be.
According to
Professor [Stylianos] Alexiou:
The absolute
date in years of the various Minoan periods is based on synchronisms with
ancient Egypt, where the chronology is adequately known [sic] thanks to the
survival of inscriptions. Thus the [Cretan] Proto Palatial Period [2000-1700
BC] is thought to be roughly contemporary with the [Egyptian] XIIth dynasty [1991-1783
BC] because fragments of [Cretan] Kamares pottery attributed to Middle Minoan
II [c. 1800 BC] have been found at Kahun in Egypt in the habitation refuses of
a settlement found in the occasion of the erection of the royal pyramids of
this [XIIth: 1991-1783 BC] dynasty. One Kamares vase was also found in a
contemporary tomb at Abydos [Egypt - Valley of the Kings]. The beginning of the
Neo Palatial period [Crete -1700 BC] must coincide with the Hyksos epoch
[1640-1550] since the lid of a stone vessel bearing the cartouche of the Hyksos
Pharaoh Khyan was discovered in Middle Minoan III [c. 1700-1600 BC] levels at
Knossos [Crete]. Equally the subsequent Neo-Palatial Cretan period [1700-1400
BC] falls within the chronological limits of the new kingdom with particular
reference to the Egyptian] XVIIIth dynasty [1550-1307 BC]: an alabaster amphora
with the cartouche of Tuthmosis III [1479-1425 BC] was found in the final
palatial period at Katsaba [Crete]. ….
No comments:
Post a Comment