Showing posts with label academia.edu Simcha Jacobovici Exodus Decoded. Show all posts
Showing posts with label academia.edu Simcha Jacobovici Exodus Decoded. Show all posts

Monday, January 12, 2015

"... easier for the Lord to remove the Israelites from Egypt than to remove Egypt from the hearts of the Israelites".

 
 
ROME — In his final public appearance of 2014, Pope Francis on Wednesday invited believers to a serious “examination of conscience” about sins both personal and communal during the past year, especially whether “the poor, weak, and marginalized are the center of our thoughts and daily actions.”
“We need a great daily attitude of Christian liberation,” the pope said, “to defend the poor rather than defending ourselves from the poor, and to defend the weak rather than defending ourselves from the weak.”
In his homily for a New Year’s Eve vespers service, Pope Francis set up a contrast between what he described as the liberation offered by Christ and the slavery imposed by sin.
          
“Paradoxically,” he said, “often more or less unconsciously we prefer slavery,” he said, arguing that the responsibility implied by freedom “frightens us.”
“A great Italian artist recently said that it was easier for the Lord to remove the Israelites from Egypt than to remove Egypt from the hearts of the Israelites,” the pope said, referring to a recent program on the Ten Commandments by Italian comedian and actor Roberto Benigni broadcast on Italian television.
“Liberty frightens us … [while] slavery reduces our sense of time to the present moment,” the pope said. “We live these moments disconnected from our past and our future, rather than being fully and really present facing eternity.”
As the Bishop of Rome, Francis placed special emphasis on the need for Romans to live up to their heritage as citizens of a city based on the “witness and martyrdom of Sts. Peter and Paul,” calling on them to fight corruption and to build “a more just city based on solidarity.”
Referring to traditional New Year’s fireworks displays, the pontiff said “they last only a few instants,” and called on people not to be seduced by “the fascination of the moment.”
    
It was another somber performance from Francis during the holiday season, after a Dec. 22 address to the elites of the Vatican cataloguing a series of “spiritual diseases” with which he believes they’re at times infected, and a Christmas Day message in which the pope lamented the suffering of children and of refugees in Iraq and Syria.
As is customary for popes on New Year’s Eve, Pope Francis led a vespers service followed by the traditional Te Deum hymn of praise in thanksgiving for the preceding year. The title comes from the Latin opening of the hymn, Te Deum laudamus, which means “Thee, O God, we praise.”
In his final tweet of 2014, Francis dispatched the simple message, “Thank you, Lord.” The pope’s Twitter feed, @Pontifex, is translated into nine languages and reaches some 17 million followers.
The Wednesday evening liturgy also involved a Eucharistic blessing by the pope and an exposition of the Blessed Sacrament, capped by singing the traditional Christmastime hymn Adeste Fideles, or “O Come, All You Faithful.”
A Vatican spokesman said the pontiff would likely return to his residence afterward to watch a traditional year-end address by the Italian President, Giorgio Napolitano, who is in the final year of an unusual second term for Italian presidents.
Earlier on New Year’s Eve, Francis sent a message of closeness and support to survivors and the families of victims of a 2004 fire at the República Cromañón nightclub in Buenos Aires, Argentina, which took place on Dec. 30 and killed 164 people and left more than 600 injured.
The fire was considered a symbol of government failure in Argentina, since the nightclub had received a permit despite lacking basic safety measures such as fire extinguishers, and the future pope had developed close relations with the survivors.
On Thursday, Francis will celebrate a morning Mass in St. Peter’s Basilica for the Solemnity of Mary, the Holy Mother of God. Since 1968, at the direction of Pope Paul VI, Jan. 1 has also been marked by the Catholic Church as the World Day of Peace.
During his noontime Angelus address tomorrow, Francis is expected to ask the crowd assembled in St. Peter’s Square to listen to the ringing of a famous Italian bell in the province of Trent erected to commemorate the fallen of the First World War, and which has since become a national symbol of peace.
Pope Francis released his message for the World Day of Peace on Dec. 8, devoting this year’s observation to the fight against human trafficking and slavery.
“Even though the international community has adopted numerous agreements aimed at ending slavery in all its forms, and has launched various strategies to combat this phenomenon, millions of people today — children, women and men of all ages — are deprived of freedom and are forced to live in conditions akin to slavery,” the pope wrote.
The pope listed exploited laborers, migrants, people forced into prostitution, people trafficked for the sale of organs, forcibly enrolled soldiers, and kidnap victims by terrorist groups as examples of modern slaves.
“I invite everyone, in accordance with his or her specific role and responsibilities, to practice acts of fraternity towards those kept in a state of enslavement,” Francis wrote.
“I urgently appeal to all men and women of good will, and all those near or far, including the highest levels of civil institutions, who witness the scourge of contemporary slavery, not to become accomplices to this evil,” he said.
The Vatican’s holiday period closes Jan. 6 with a Mass celebrated by Pope Francis for the feast of the Epiphany, which commemorates the visit of the Magi, or wise men, to the Christ child, and thus the revelation of God as a human being.
Then the pope resumes a busy working schedule, with his annual address to the diplomatic corps set for Jan. 12; later that day, he’s scheduled to depart for a week-long visit to Sri Lanka and the Philippines.
 
....
 


Thursday, December 11, 2014

Film "Exodus: Gods and Kings" Perpetuates False Idea of Ramses and Moses Together


exodusramses



Following yesterday’s Moses featurette, we now have a look at Ramses in Ridley Scot’s Exodus: Gods and Kings, opening in theaters on December 12. Watch the video below to see Joel Edgerton talking about his character!
 
Exodus: Gods and Kings is the story of one man’s daring courage to take on the might of an empire. sing state of the art visual effects and 3D immersion, Scott brings new life to the story of the defiant leader Moses (Christian Bale) as he rises up against the Egyptian Pharaoh Ramses (Joel Edgerton), setting 600,000 slaves on a monumental journey of escape from Egypt and its terrifying cycle of deadly plagues.



Wednesday, July 2, 2014

The Laws of Eshnunna and the Books of Moses

Moses_1

 
 
Adapted from: http://jerryandgod.com/2012/06/26/the-passover/
 
 
The Laws of Moses and Laws of Eshnunna

Eshnunna, which lay east of Babylon, was for a brief period a dominant city in Mesopotamia, and a code of laws has been discovered from this civilization.
 
Judging from the fragments that remain of the laws’ superscription, it appears that King Dadusha issued this law code for his city.
It is the earliest example of an Akkadian law code discovered to date and anticipates form and content its successor, the much moore famous Code of Hammurabi (who conquered Eshnunna).
 
The code of Eshnunna is fairly short but covers a wide range of topics, including price controls for products like barley and wool and regulations involving theft, the status of slaves, marital relations, crimes of violence, and vicious animals.
It includes, for example, laws concerning a dangerous ox and the liability of its owner, which are closely paralleled in Ex 21:28-32.
The Eshnunna law code is significant for Biblical studies. It confirms that a code of laws similar to those we find in the Bible could have existed as early as the time of Moses.
Some histori­ans have argued that the bulk of Israel’s laws were very late, coming into existence long after Moses’ day.
 
But we think instead that Dadusha was King David himself, ruling Mesopotamia, and continuing to apply the now ancient Laws of Moses.
The laws of Eshnunna began with a royal superscription that proclaimed this standardization as instrumental in establishing justice, eliminating enmity, and protecting the weak.

Laws of Moses Influencing Legal System of Eshnunna





King David as Dadusha the Lawgiver of Eshnunna



We read as follows about the Laws of Dadusha:


The Codex Ešnunna was written in the nineteenth century, about a generation before the more famous Codex Hammurapi of Babylon. It was a time when the kingdom of Ešnunna became very powerful, especially under its king Naram-Sin who ruled Assyria. Laws from Ešnunna were promulagated later by the Ešnunna king Dadusha. These laws have been compared with the biblical Covenant Code for the alternating arrangement of some civil and penal cases; but the most striking parallel for content comes in one specific law about a goring ox:

Codex Ešnunna 53:
“If an ox gored and killed an(other) ox, both ox owners shall divide the price of the live ox and the carcase of the dead ox.”

Exodus 21:35:
“And if one man’s ox harms another’s so that it dies, the owners must sell the live ox and share the price of it … they shall also share the dead animal.”

….
 

The Laws are written in Akkadian and consist of two tablets which are marked with A and B. In 1948, Albrecht Goetze of the Yale University had translated and published them. In some sources the Laws of Eshnunna are mentioned as the Laws of Bilalama due to the belief that the Eshnunnian ruler probably was their originator, but Goetze maintained that tablet B was originated under the reign of Dadusha. The text of the prologue is broken at the point where the ruler who promulgated the laws was specified.
Albrecht Goetze has noticed the specific style of expression. The laws were composed in a mode that facilitated memorizing. A distinguished Israeli scientist and one of the foremost experts on this collection of laws, Reuven Yaron of the University of Jerusalem concerning this matter stated: “What matters to me – and might have mattered to those who fashioned them almost 4000 years ago – is the ease of remembering the text.”
The conditional sentence (“If A then B” – as it also is the case with the other Mesopotamian laws) is an attribute of this codification. In 23 paragraphs, it appears in the form šumma awilum – “If a man…” After the disposition, a precise sanction follows, e.g. LU42(A): “If a man bit and severed the nose of a man, one mina silver he shall weigh out.”
The Laws clearly show signs of social stratification, mainly focussing on two different classes: the muškenum and awilum. The audience of the Laws of Eshnunna is more extensive than in the case of the earlier cuneiform codifications: awilum – free men and women (mar awilim and marat awilim), muškenum, wife (aššatum), son (maru), slaves of both sexes – male (wardum) and female (amtum) – which are not only objects of law as in classical slavery, and delicts where the victims were slaves have been sanctioned, and other class designations as ubarum, apþarum, mudum that are not ascertained.
Reuven Yaron has divided the offences of the Laws of Eshnunna into five groups. The articles of the first group had to be collected from all over the Laws and the articles of the other four were roughly ordered one after the other:
1. Theft and related offences,
2. False distraint,
3. Sexual offences,
4. Bodily injuries,
5. Damages caused by a goring ox and comparable cases.
The majority of these offences were penalized with pecuniary fines (an amount of silver), but some serious offences such as burglary, murder, and sexual offences were penalized with death. It seems that the capital punishment was avoidable (in contrast to the Code of Hammurabi), because of the standard formulation: “It is a case of life … he shall die”.

This is an excerpt from the article Codes of Eshnunna from the Wikipedia free encyclopedia. A list of authors is available at Wikipedia.

….


King David

If Hammurabi was Solomon, as we think, then Hammurabi’s father, Sin-muballit (“The god Sin is the giver of life”, but Sin was also interchangeable with El, see below), must be King David. Unfortunately we know so little about Sin-muballit.
Only scanty information exists about [Hammurabi’s] immediate family: his father, Sin-muballit; his sister, Iltani; and his firstborn son and successor, Samsuiluna, are known by name. [http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/545565/Sin-muballit].
A second synchronism (already referred to) between the First Dynasty of Babylon and Larsa is provided in a historical record from the reign of Hammurabi’s father, Sin-muballit. Sin-muballit attacked Isin and reduced it to submission in his year 16, which was year 22 of Damiq-ilishu …. . This event became the year name of Sin-muballit’s succeeding year. (“Orientalia”, series 2, no. 24, “Chronological Notes,” by H. Levy.)
In Sin-Muballit’s 13th year, he repelled the army of Ur, which had invaded the territory of Babylon. In the 17th year of his reign, Sin-Muballit took possession of the city of Isin and his power grew steadily over time as evidenced by his building and fortifying a number of fortresses.[3]

Sin-muballit must have an alter ego, or several.
We would like to propose that Sin-muballit was also the contemporaneous Naram Sin (“Beloved of Sin”) of Eshnunna, whom Marc van de Mieroop (A History of the Ancient Near East, C. 3000-323 BC (2003) Blackwell, Oxford. ISBN 0-631-22552-8) places right alongside a Dadusha (now there is a David name!) in his king list. I take this Dadusha of Eshnunna to be Naram Sin/David also. Naram Sin was, like David (meaning “Beloved”), a beloved of God. He was also a foe of Shamsi-Adad I (the biblical Hadadezer).
When Assyria was conquered by Naram-Sin, king of Eshnunna, Ila-Kabkaba’s son (or descendant), Shamshi-Adad, fled to Babylon.
When Naram-Sin of Eshnunna conquered Assyria, he also captured Ekallatum and Shamshi-Adad fled to Babylon. http://www.oocities.org/garyweb65/oldassy.html
We take the mighty Naram Sim of Eshnunna to be King David, the father of Solomon/Hammurabi, and the same as Sin-muballit and Dadusha, a man beloved of God.
Regarding the meaning of the “fully Akkadian” name of Hammurabi’s father, Sin-muballit [660], we find that it meant, “The god Sin is the giver of life”. Now, since the Aramaeans are known to have equated their god, El, with the name Sin, then this, king David’s Akkadian name, as we are proposing, could just as well have meant “God is the giver of life”. This would be a most appropriate appellation for king David, who would write, in Psalm 21:4: “[The king, David] asked you for life; you gave it to him – length of days forever and ever.”
 

Similarities between the legal system of Babylon and the Law of Moses

Similarities between the legal systems of Babylon and Judah

Benjamin Jones writes in Exodus: The Hammurabi Code

….

“The Covenant Code, the set of laws given by Yahweh to Moses, who conveyed them to the Israelites, bears a marked similarity to the law codes of Mesopotamia, including, in particular, the Code of Hammurabi. Many of the same moral and legal issues are addressed, and both the presentation of themes and the narrative style of the two documents bear a strong resemblance to one another”.

Jones then asks:

“This similarity begs the question: what was the inspiration for the Covenant Code? Do the similarities between the Law of Hammurabi and the Covenant Code reflect similarities between the legal systems of Babylon and Judah, with the two systems and records developing simultaneously? Or was the law in Exodus appropriated directly from the laws of Hammurabi, as a philosophical or scholarly exercise?”

AMAIC Comment:

According to our revision of history, Hammurabi was King Solomon ruling Babylon. Hence the famous Laws of Hammurabi reflect the Law of Moses (Exodus) due to Solomon’s and Israel’s reverence for the great Lawgiver, Moses.

Tuesday, April 22, 2014

Ancient Evidence of the Exodus from Egypt



Some historians set the time of the Exodus story around the time of Ramses II (1303 BCE-1213 BCE). The Tanakh claims that the Israelis built Ramses, while an inscription from around the time of Ramses II states “Distribute grain rations to the soldiers and to the Apiru who transport stones to the great pylon of Ramses.” Similarly, a victory stele of Pharaoh Amenhotep II (1427 BCE-1401 BCE), lists various captives sent to Egypt and 3600 Apiru are listed as Egyptian slaves, implying that Apiru slaves were already in the Land of Egypt in the time of Ramses II. Some scholars believe the Apiru to be Hebrews.

Pharaoh's DaughterHowever, ancient Egyptian records assert that nothing resembling the Exodus story took place during the time of Ramses II. This fact has led some to question the existence of the Exodus story. Yet, Immanuel Velikovsky, writing in 1952, has asserted that the apparent conflict between archeology and the Tanakh related to the Exodus story is based on the fact that the Exodus story has been misdated and that if the Exodus story is dated correctly, all such contradictions disappear. Furthermore, the archeologist Emmanuel Anati asserted, “The name of Ramses, in the book of Exodus and in that of Genesis, emerges as a geographical indication: it indicates the site where, according to tradition, the Hebrews were in Egypt. It is not necessarily the same name that the site must have had at the epoch of the Patriarchs or at the time of Moses.”

Parting of Red SeaIndeed, according to the Midrash, the Pharoah of the Exodus story was named Adikam, not Ramses II, and he had a short reign of four years before drowning in the Red Sea. The Pharaoh who preceded Adikam, according to the Midrash, was named Malul, who reigned from age six to 100. Interestingly, the Egyptian historian priest, Manetho, writing in the 3rd century BCE, as well as an ancient Egyptian papyrus known as the Turin Royal Cannon mentioned a pharaoh who ruled from age six to 100 known as Pepi II (2284 BCE-2184 BCE).
Interestingly, during the Sixth Dynasty, of which Pepi II was part, the Egyptians conducted many punitive raids. According to Anati, “A commander by the name of Uni immortalised the actions against the Asiatics “that live in the territory of sand” and describes situations comparable to those in the book of Exodus. From the accounts we get a picture of a world conceptually and contextually very near that described in the biblical narrations. The army of Uni devastated the animal enclosures, destroyed the huts, chopped down the figs and grape trees and safely came back to Egypt.”

ipuwer papyrusFurthermore, the Ipuwer Ammunitions, dated between 2345 BCE to 2181 BCE, describes many events very similar to the Ten Plagues. One papyrus notes “the river is blood,” which corresponds with Exodus 7:20, stating “all of the waters that were in the river turned to blood. Another papyrus claimed “the land is not light,” which is similar to Exodus 10:22, “and there was a thick darkness in all of the land of Egypt.” Yet still another papyrus spoke of “forsooth, gates, columns, and walls” being “consumed by fire,” while Exodus 9:23-24 asserted, “The fire ran along the ground….there was hail and fire mingled with hail, very grievous.”

And another papyrus spoke of how the trees were “destroyed. No fruits nor herbs were found.” Exodus 9:25 claimed, “And the hail smote every herb of the field and brake every tree of the field.” Furthermore, even the killing of the First Born Sons was mentioned in this Papyrus, claiming, “Forsooth, the children of princes are dashed against the wall. Forsooth, the children of princes are cast into the streets.” Exodus 12:29 declared, “And it came to pass, at midnight, the Lord smote all of the firstborn in the Land of Egypt, from the firstborn of Pharoah that sat on the throne unto the firstborn of the captive that sat in the dungeon.” Although the matter is still hotly debated, given this evidence, the Exodus story could likely have taken place earlier than what many archaeologists assert.

By Rachel Avraham

....

Taken from: http://unitedwithisrael.org/archeological-parrallels-for-the-exodus-story/








Friday, April 11, 2014

No archaeological evidence to support Ramses II as Pharaoh of Exodus: Ron Beeri



Rare sarcophagus, Egyptian scarab found in Israel

Associated Press
Content preferences                    
This undated photo released by Israel’s Antiquities Authority shows a sarcophagus found at Tel Shadud, an archaeological mound in the Jezreel Valley. Israeli archaeologists have unearthed a rare sarcophagus featuring a slender face and a scarab ring inscribed with the name of an Egyptian pharaoh, Israel’s Antiquities Authority said Wednesday April 9, 2014. (AP Photo/ Israel’s Antiquities Authority)
.
View gallery


  • .

. ....

JERUSALEM (AP) — Israeli archaeologists have unearthed a rare sarcophagus featuring a slender face and a scarab ring inscribed with the name of an Egyptian pharaoh, Israel's Antiquities Authority said Wednesday.
The mystery man whose skeleton was found inside the sarcophagus was most likely a local Canaanite official in the service of ancient Egypt, Israeli archaeologists believe, shining a light on a period when pharaohs governed the region.
"This is a really beautiful face, very serene," said Edwin van den Brink, an Egyptologist and archaeologist with Israel's government antiquities authority. "It's very appealing."
Van den Brink said archaeologists dug at Tel Shadud, an archaeological mound in the Jezreel Valley, from December until last month. The archaeologists first uncovered the foot of the sarcophagus and took about three weeks to work their way up the coffin. Only on one of the excavation's last days did they brush away the dirt to uncover the carved face.
The lid of the clay sarcophagus is shattered, but the sculpted face remains nearly intact. It features graceful eyebrows, almond-shaped eyes, a long nose and plump lips. Ears are separated from the face, and long-fingered hands are depicted as if the dead man's arms were crossed atop his chest, in a typical Egyptian burial pose.
Experts last found such a sarcophagus about a half a century ago in Deir al Balah in the Gaza Strip, where some 50 similar coffins were dug up, mostly by grave robbers, van den Brink said. Some of them greet visitors today at the entrance to the archaeology wing at the Israel Museum in Jerusalem. Dozens were previously found in Beit Shean in Israel's north.









Found alongside the new sarcophagus was a scarab seal ring encased in gold, carved with the name of Pharaoh Seti I, who ruled ancient Egypt in the 13th century BC. Seti I conquered the area of today's Israel in the first year of his reign, in order to secure Egyptian trade routes and collect taxes for Egypt, said archaeologist Ron Beeri, who participated in the dig. The man buried in the sarcophagus might have been a tax collector for the pharaoh, Beeri said.
Seti I was the father of Ramses II, often identified as the pharaoh in the biblical story of the Israelite exodus, though Beeri said there is no historical evidence to support that.
DNA tests may be conducted to determine if the man in the sarcophagus was Canaanite or Egyptian, Beeri said.
The recent archaeological discovery, like most in Israel, came by happenstance. Israel's natural gas company called in archaeologists to survey the territory before laying down a pipeline. Van den Brink said the Antiquities Authority excavated only a small, 5-by-5 meter (16-by-16 foot) area, but that was enough to find the sarcophagus, the scarab and four other human remains.
Van den Brink said the site likely was a large cemetery, with other sarcophagi likely waiting to be found in future digs.
"It's just a small window that we opened," he said.





....