Tuesday, May 5, 2026

Pharaoh Sneferu

 



by

 

Damien F. Mackey

 

 

 

“Snofru soon became a legendary figure, and literature in later periods credited him with a genial personality”.

 

“Cheops ... is portrayed in [Papyrus Westcar] as the traditional legendary oriental monarch, good-natured …”.

 

Nicolas Grimal

 

 

 

Introduction

 

Throughout various articles now I have concluded that the ancient Egyptian dynasty that oppressed the Israelites at the time of Moses consisted of only four rulers, with the other names being duplicates, or triplicates. These rulers were, in order:

 

1.       The “new king” of Exodus 1:8, who began the Oppression of Israel;

2.       Moses, presumed son of 1., who ruled briefly and who then abdicated;

3.      “Chenephres” of tradition, married to “Merris’ of tradition, the Egyptian foster-mother of Moses; and, lastly, a

4.      Female Pharaoh.

 

And I have further concluded that the life of the historical Moses actually spans two kingdoms (Old and ‘Middle’), conventionally speaking, and five dynasties (4th; 5th; 6th; 12th and 13th).

 

As was the case with Joseph, son of Jacob, the life of Moses starkly reveals the inadequacies of the received Egyptian dynastic history and completely reforms it.

 

Here we are concerned only with Egypt’s so-called 4th dynasty, the Giza pyramid and Sphinx building dynasty.

 

Fourth Dynasty of Egypt

 

My re-setting of ancient Egypt via Moses necessitates an alteration to the first part of the Fourth Dynasty king list (1-4):

 

1 Sneferu

2 Khufu

3 Djedefre

4 Khafre

 

Four kings now needing to become three.

 

While kings 2-4 here now become fairly straightforward, 1. Sneferu (Snofru) I have found to be something of an outlier.

 

2. Khufu (Cheops), whose daughter Meresankh married 4. Khafre (Chephren), is clearly the oppressive “new king” of Exodus 1:8, the dynastic founder, with Meresankh being “Merris”, the traditional (Artapanus) foster-mother of Moses, who married “Chenephres”, 4. Khafre (Chephren).

 

That leaves 3. Djedefre, the presumed son of Khufu, as the brief-reigning Moses.

 

Sneferu (Snofru)

 

1.                   Sneferu, a long-reigning king, can thus immediately be ruled out as Moses.

 

Arguments could be mounted for Sneferu (“a genial personality”) to have been Cheops, “good-natured” (though tell that to the Israelites groaning under his oppression), or Sneferu, who was likewise (as was Khafre) associated with a Meresankh.

 

Previously I had written on this, following Nicolas Grimal (A History of Ancient Egypt, 1992):

 

Meresankh (“Merris”)

 

P. 170

 

Snofru is also associated with a Meresankh, though she is considered to be his mother.

P. 67 [She was] one of Huni’s concubines. There is no definite proof of this ....

 

Meresankh will become something of a golden thread, linking the traditional “Merris” of Moses’ childhood to the 4th Dynasty …. 

 

Likenesses to Cheops

 

This (somewhat semi-legendary) ruler, Sneferu, seems to me to connect well with Cheops in various ways. For instance (the pages are taken from N. Grimal’s A History of Ancient Egypt):

 

Great “legendary” reputation – good natured

 

P. 67

 

.... Snofru soon became a legendary figure, and literature in later [?] periods credited him with a genial personality. He was even deified in the Middle Kingdom, becoming the ideal king who later Egyptian rulers … sought to emulate when they were attempting to legitimize their power.  

 

P. 70

 

Cheops ... is portrayed in [Papyrus Westcar] as the traditional legendary oriental monarch, good-natured, and eager to be shown magical things, amiable towards his inferiors and interested in the nature of human existence.

Cult figure

 

P. 67

 

Snofru’s enviable reputation with later rulers, which according to the onomastica was increased by his great popularity with the people, even led to the restoration of Snofru’s mortuary temple at Dahshur. P. 69 ... cult among Middle Kingdom miners in the Sinai.

P. 165 There is even evidence of a Twelfth Dynasty cult of Snofru in the region of modern Ankara.

 

P. 70

 

Cheops was not remembered as fondly as Snofru, although his funerary cult was still attested in the Saite (Twenty-Sixth) Dynasty and he was increasingly popular in the Roman period. According to Papyrus Westcar, he liked to listen to fantastic stories of the reigns of his predecessors.

 

Like his potential alter ego Cheops,

P. 67 [Snofru’s] reign  ... appears to have been both glorious and long-lasting (perhaps as much as forty years).

 

Snofru built

... ships, fortresses, palaces and temples ...

Three pyramids.

 

If Snofru were Cheops, as I am thinking, then Snofru’s three pyramids - built perhaps early in his reign - would have been the perfect preparation for his later masterpiece, the Great Pyramid at Giza:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sneferu

Under Sneferu [Snofru], there was a major evolution in monumental pyramid structures, which would lead to Khufu's Great Pyramid, which would be seen as the pinnacle of the Egyptian Old Kingdom's majesty and splendour, and as one of the Seven Wonders of the Ancient World”.

 

Less positive picture of the king   

 

P. 71

 

... it is difficult to accommodate within this theory [building immoderation = unpopularity] the fact that Snofru’s reputation remained untarnished when he built more pyramids than any of his successors.

 

Pp. 69-70

 

[Cheops’] pyramid transforms him into the very symbol of absolute rule, and Herodotus’ version of events chose to emphasise his cruelty:

https://www.sacred-texts.com/cla/hh/hh2120.htm

 

124. ... Cheops became king over them and brought them to every kind of evil: for he shut up all the temples, and having first kept them from sacrificing there, he then bade all the Egyptians work for him. So some were appointed to draw stones from the stone-quarries in the Arabian mountains to the Nile, and others he ordered to receive the stones after they had been carried over the river in boats, and to draw them to those which are called the Libyan mountains; and they worked by a hundred thousand men at a time, for each three months continually. Of this oppression there passed ten years while the causeway was made by which they drew the stones, which causeway they built, and it is a work not much less, as it appears to me, than the pyramid; for the length of it is five furlongs and the breadth ten fathoms and the height, where it is highest, eight fathoms, and it is made of stone smoothed and with figures carved upon it. For this, they said, the ten years were spent, and for the underground chambers on the hill upon which the pyramids stand, which he caused to be made as sepulchral chambers for himself in an island, having conducted thither a channel from the Nile.

 

For the making of the pyramid itself there passed a period of twenty years; and the pyramid is square, each side measuring eight hundred feet, and the height of it is the same. It is built of stone smoothed and fitted together in the most perfect manner, not one of the stones being less than thirty feet in length.

 

Moreover:

 

126. Cheops moreover came, they said, to such a pitch of wickedness, that being in want of money he caused his own daughter to sit in the stews, and ordered her to obtain from those who came a certain amount of money (how much it was they did not tell me); but she not only obtained the sum appointed by her father, but also she formed a design for herself privately to leave behind her a memorial, and she requested each man who came in to her to give her one stone upon her building: and of these stones, they told me, the pyramid was built which stands in front of the great pyramid in the middle of the three, each side being one hundred and fifty feet in length. ….

 

Monday, April 20, 2026

Following Middle Bronze I Israel after the Exodus from cruel Egypt

 



 

by

 

Damien F. Mackey

  

The people of Israel had witnessed the miraculous and had the miraculous ever before them in the form of the Glory Cloud (popularly known as the Shekinah).

  

Introduction

 

After the miraculous Exodus from Egypt, a sign that was meant to be remembered down through the generations (cf. Deuteronomy 6:6-7), Moses and his people sang of the Lord’s power and glory (Exodus 15:1-21).

 

Moses, so eager when in Egypt to free his people - but having succumbed to the comforts of married life during his long sojourn in Midian, hoping that the Lord might consider someone else for the daunting task - was now fully reconciled again to what the Lord was asking from him.

Family life seems to have become a matter of secondary importance – though there will soon be a moment of controversy regarding his Midianite wife, Zipporah.

 

But it would not be long before the people of Moses, the Israelites, despite all that had recently happened, took to their customary grumbling again. Only 2 verses into the next chapter of the Book of Exodus do we read (16:2-3):

 

In the desert the whole community grumbled against Moses and Aaron. The Israelites said to them, ‘If only we had died by the Lord’s hand in Egypt! There we sat around pots of meat and ate all the food we wanted, but you have brought us out into this desert to starve this entire assembly to death’.

 

At the forefront of this would be that ungrateful Reubenite pair, Dathan and Abiram (“Jannes and Jambres” as St. Paul would much later call them, 2 Timothy 3:8).

 

Some fellow Levites would also rise up in rebellion against Moses.

 

And so, even, would Moses’ own older brother and sister, Aaron and Miriam.

 

God detests ingratitude.

 

Psalm 105:21-25 (Douay version) sums up what the Lord had done for Israel and how ungrateful Israel had repaid Him:

 

They forgot God, who saved them, who had done great things in Egypt, Wondrous works in the land of Cham: terrible things in the Red Sea. And he said that he would destroy them: had not Moses his chosen stood before him in the breach: To turn away his wrath, lest he should destroy them. And they set at nought the desirable land. They believed not his word, And they murmured in their tents: they hearkened not to the voice of the Lord.

 

The C20th world, too, had forgotten God, prompting Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn to recall the old lament: “Men have forgotten God; that’s why all this has happened”.

 

 

Still, we have forgotten Him, hence our world gone utterly mad.

 

The people of Israel had witnessed the miraculous and had the miraculous ever before them in the form of the Glory Cloud (popularly known as the Shekinah).

 

The Gentile nations, aware of all of this, were also meant to acknowledge the might and power of the Lord. When they didn’t, when peoples like the Amalekites, the Ammonites and the Moabites, the giant king Og of Bashan, hindered Israel on its path to the Promised Land, the Lord rose up in fury against these as well.

 

The historical context

 

As I have noted previously:

My purpose has been, not so much theological and interpretive, as an effort to show that the Bible is real history, with a firm archaeology (and sometimes geology) underpinning the whole of it.

Geographical corrections have also proven to be a crucial part of this task.

 

Possibly no other part of the Bible lends itself more satisfactorily to an archaeological investigation than does the Exodus and Joshuan Conquest.

It should be - and indeed is - in plain sight. 

 

Sadly however, as we have read, the yoking of the Bible to an overblown chronology (by the likes of Dr. Albright and Fr. Louis Hugues-Vincent) has resulted in the massive amount of archaeological evidence for the Exodus and the Conquest becoming completely overlooked, with a different (and totally unsuitable) era preferred by the experts.

 

As we have determined, Moses departed Midian not long after the termination of the cruelly oppressive Twelfth Dynasty of Egypt, whose last ruler, briefly, was a female. Moses and Aaron would now face the Thirteenth Dynasty pharaoh, a man of military background, Neferhotep I. Archaeologically, it was this providential point in time, when workmen are found to have abandoned their sites at places like Illahûn, that Egyptianised ‘Asiatics’ (the fleeing Israelites) would depart from Egypt, later to be replaced by Non-Egyptianised ‘Asiatics’, the Hyksos invaders.

 

These, we shall probably meet as the Amalekites.

 

Dr. Immanuel Velikovsky had called the Hyksos invasion of a greatly weakened Egypt “the Eleventh Plague”.

 

Grumbling Israel

 

The manna with which the Lord would so providentially feed in abundance the grumbling Israelites was almost certainly not a purely miraculous phenomenon, like the quails which also came, since both have been experienced in this desert region.

 

Rightly, though, the manna has become a symbol of the Blessed Eucharist.

 

Later, the famous image of the bronze serpent suspended on a pole will become a symbol of Jesus Christ on the Cross, and will be biblically interpreted as such (John 3:14): ‘Just as Moses lifted up the serpent in the wilderness, so the Son of Man must be lifted up, that everyone who believes may have eternal life in him’.

 

Return to Mount Sinai

 

The Exodus route taken by the Israelites to Mount Sinai, and the identification of the mountain, have become the topic of interest of countless articles and videos.

 

But no two of these seem to agree. 

 

Immediately to be rejected are those interpretations that do not take into consideration that a great mass of nomadic people wandering in desert regions would be in need of regular drinking water stopping points, wells, along the way.

 

The beauty of professor Emmanuel Anati’s proposed Exodus route is that it has been determined by one who has had decades of archaeological experience in the regions and has duly taken into account the need for drinking water, not to mention the location of the tribes mentioned in the Exodus account: Midian, Amalek, etc.

 

Previously, it has been suggested that a location of the Sea of Reeds closer to Egypt than Anati’s Lake Serbonis would be preferable, and that – while his location of Israel’s encampment in the Karkom Valley appears to fit very well indeed – the holy mountain may not actually be his choice of Har Karkom there, but rather a mysterious mountain right in the centre of the Karkom Valley, as identified by professor Anati’s colleague, Flavio Barbiero.

 

Both the professor and Flavio Barbiero appear to be in harmony, though, with the location of Rephidim and its important water source (they locate it at Beer Karkom), about which we next read (Exodus 17:1-7):

 

The whole Israelite community set out from the Desert of Sin, traveling from place to place as the Lord commanded. They camped at Rephidim, but there was no water for the people to drink. So they quarreled with Moses and said, ‘Give us water to drink’.

Moses replied, ‘Why do you quarrel with me? Why do you put the Lord to the test?’

But the people were thirsty for water there, and they grumbled against Moses. They said, ‘Why did you bring us up out of Egypt to make us and our children and livestock die of thirst’?

Then Moses cried out to the Lord, ‘What am I to do with these people? They are almost ready to stone me’.

The Lord answered Moses, ‘Go out in front of the people. Take with you some of the elders of Israel and take in your hand the staff with which you struck the Nile, and go. I will stand there before you by the rock at Horeb. Strike the rock, and water will come out of it for the people to drink’. So Moses did this in the sight of the elders of Israel. And he called the place Massah and Meribah because the Israelites quarreled and because they tested the Lord saying, ‘Is the Lord among us or not?’

 

Israel’s grumbling had become so insistent that places were even named after it.

 

Wednesday, March 18, 2026

Was Moses indeed a King of Egypt – albeit briefly?




by

Damien F. Mackey

 

 

There was … Kagemni, which name occurs in both the Fourth and Sixth dynasties. Egyptologists, with their lengthy chronological separation of the

Fourth from the Sixth dynasty must assume that two Viziers Kagemni

are involved here. No need for that if, as I think, the Fourth and

Sixth dynasties were contemporaneous.

 

 

 

My search for the historical Moses

 

·       Phase One

 

Initially, inspired by a legend that Moses was “a king” (was this clue from Artapanus?), I searched for him amongst whichever pharaohs I considered to be chronologically reasonable for Moses.

 

This took up a lot of time, with no positive result.

 

·       Phase Two

 

Much later, after I had to my satisfaction identified Moses as Vizier and Chief Judge of Egypt (cf. Exodus 2:14) - a high office, but clearly subordinate to Pharaoh - I came to reject any notion that Moses could have been a King (Pharaoh).

And I decried legends that, whilst often helpful, can sometimes be highly misleading.

See e.g. my article:

 

‘Chenephres’ drives Moses out of Egypt

 

(6) 'Chenephres' drives Moses out of Egypt

 

Moses was, I now confidently concluded:

 

Sixth Dynasty: Weni (Uni), Vizer and Chief Judge;

Twelfth Dynasty: Mentuhotep, Vizer and Chief Judge, and

the semi-legendary Sinuhe, whose story shares “a common matrix”

with that of Moses (professor Emmanuel Anati).

 

I also liked Moses as the Sixth Dynasty’s general and trader, Iny, a name very like Weni (Uni), and who, like Weni, was nautically involved in both war and trading.

 

·       Phase Three

 

Now, in late March 2025, a handful of likely Moses types came to my notice.

These were all writers and teachers of Instructions and Maxims.

 

But, most significantly, a briefly reigning Pharaoh is amongst them. See Phase Four.

 

There was (i) Kagemni, which name occurs in both the Fourth and Sixth dynasties. Egyptologists, with their lengthy chronological separation of the Fourth from the Sixth dynasty must assume that two Viziers Kagemni are involved here.

 

No need for that if, as I think, the Fourth and Sixth dynasties were contemporaneous.

 

Kagemni wrote Instructions. (Cf. Acts 7:22: “And Moses was learned in all the wisdom of the Egyptians, and was mighty in words and deeds)”.

And he, like Weni-Mentuhotep, Vizier and Chief Judge, was “Chief justice and vizier”.

 

There was also (ii) Ptahhotep. Many, myself included, have been hypnotised by his supposed life span of 110 years, like Joseph of Egypt (Genesis 50:26): “So Joseph died at the age of 110”. And we have tried to make of Ptahhotep the biblical Joseph. But, although he is sometimes mentioned in a Third Dynasty (Joseph’s) context, he properly belonged to the Fifth Dynasty (Moses’s).

 

Dr. Ernest L. Martin, who was absolutely convinced that Ptahhotep was Joseph, mistakenly mentioned him in a Third Dynasty context: “This Egyptian document is often called “The Oldest Book in the World” and was originally written by the vizier in the Fifth (or Third) Dynasty”:

https://www.askelm.com/doctrine/d040501.htm

 

Ptahhotep handed down wise Maxims.

 

There was (iii) Djedefhor (Hordjedef), another wise writer of Instructions during the Fourth Dynasty.

 

Summary of One to Three

 

Moses, as Weni(Iny)-Mentuhotep, Vizier and Chief Judge (Fourth/Twelfth dynasties), combines nicely with Kagemni, Chief Justice and Vizier, Fourth/Sixth dynasties, also greatly strengthening my case for the Fourth and Sixth being just the one dynasty.

 

And Kagemni, as a writer of Instructions, combines nicely with the Vizier Ptahhotep (Fifth Dynasty), a famous sage and writer of Maxims – both of these now connecting with Djedefhor (Fourth Dynasty), for all of the same reasons.

 

Now, this is where Moses as a briefly-reigning king comes in.

 

·       Phase Four

 

The wise Djedefhor was actually a son of Khufu, our dynastic founding “new king” of Exodus 1:8. Like Weni (my Moses), known as “the Elder” - pertaining to scholarship? - Djedefhor was called “the Old”.

And like Moses, who renounced the Crown (Hebrews 11:24-26):

 

By faith Moses refused to be called the son of Pharaoh’s daughter when he was grown up. He chose to be mistreated with God’s people instead of having the temporary pleasures of sin. He thought that the abuses he suffered for Christ were more valuable than the treasures of Egypt, since he was looking forward to the reward ….

 

Djedefhor disdained to become Crown Prince. And he later abdicated.

 

Here is the Moses-like Biography of this scholarly prince:

https://althistory.fandom.com/wiki/Djedefhor_I_(Pharaonic_Survival)

 

Djedefhor I (Pharaonic Survival)

….

 

Djedefhor, called the Old and the Scholar, was an ancient Egyptian pharaoh of the Fourth Dynasty during the Old Kingdom. He is also known as Hordjedef. Djedefhor was the son of Khufuand successor of Bakara, his nephew, and his mother was Meritites I. He is notable for being one of the few Egyptian Pharaohs to Abdicate ….

 

Biography

 

Djedefhor was a son of Pharaoh Khufu and brother of pharaohs Djedefra and Khafra his mother was Queen Meritites … making him a full brother of Djedefra ….

 

The Teachings of Djedefhor, a document of which only fragments remain, is attributed to him. Djedefhor was deified after his death. ….

 

As a prince, Djedefhor dedicated himself to scholarly pursuits, showing a profound interest in education and intellectual growth. His elder brother Kawab's untimely death left a vacancy in the line of succession. Their father, Khufu, initially intended for Djedefhor to ascend the throne, recognizing his wisdom and capabilities. However, Djedefhor declined the offer, feeling that his contributions were better suited to other roles. Consequently, his younger brother Djedefra [sic] was named Crown Prince.

 

Djedefhor continued to cultivate his reputation as a learned and highly respected individual. His counsel was sought after and greatly valued during the reigns of his brothers, contributing significantly to the governance and intellectual climate of the time.

 

Upon the premature death of King Bakara, Djedefhor was elected king by the Great 20 of Upper and Lower Egypt.

[End of quote]

 

A few clarifications are necessary here:

 

Djedefhor’s presumed mother, Meritites, would likely be the same as Meresankh (Ankhesenmerire), Moses’s actual Egyptian foster-mother, “Merris” (Artapanus).

 

His supposed half-brother, Djedefra, who reigned for a short time, would be Djedefhor himself. The names are identical, except for the altered theophoric, where ra (the Sun god, Ra) is replaced with hor (the falcon god, Horus):

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Djedefre

Djedefre (also known as Djedefra and Radjedef; died c. 2558 BC) [sic] was an ancient Egyptian king … of the 4th Dynasty during the Old Kingdom.

 

He is well known by the Hellenized form of his name RhatoisÄ“s (Ῥατοίσης) by Manetho. Djedefre was the son and immediate throne successor of Khufu, the builder of the Great Pyramid of Giza ….

 

Finally, since the Fourth and Sixth dynasties were one and the same, Djedefre would be the same as the short-reigning, Userkare, who, most interestingly, was erased by Pepi (one of my versions of ‘Chenephres’ who pursued Moses out of Egypt), with the word “desert” (to where Moses fled) inserted:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Userkare

Userkare (also Woserkare, meaning "Powerful is the soul of Ra"; died c. 2332 BC) [sic] was the second king of the Sixth Dynasty of Egypt, reigning briefly, 1 to 5 years, in the late 24th or the early 23rd century BC. Userkare's relation to his predecessor Teti and successor Pepi … is unknown and his reign remains enigmatic.

 

Although he is attested in some historical sources, Userkare is completely absent from the tomb of the Egyptian officials who lived during his reign and usually report the names of the kings whom they served. Furthermore, the figures of some high officials of the period have been deliberately chiselled out in their tombs and their titles altered, for instance the word "king" being replaced by that of "desert". Egyptologists thus suspect a possible Damnatio memoriae on Pepi I's behalf against Userkare. ….

 

More recently, I have added this extra dimension to Moses as pharaoh:

 

Moses in Egypt’s Fifth Dynasty

 

(4) Moses in Egypt’s Fifth Dynasty

 

Introduction

 

This re-working of my article under the same title, “Moses in Egypt’s Fifth Dynasty”, has become necessary due to my brand new recognition of Moses as the Fifth Dynasty pharaoh, Niuserre Ini, to accompany his pharaonic alter egos of Djedefre-Djedefhor (Fourth Dynasty) and Userkare (Sixth Dynasty). ….