Tuesday, October 1, 2013

Joseph, son of Jacob (Israel), was Imhotep, of Egyptian History



Taken from: http://theegyptianidentityofjoseph.wordpress.com/2012/02/20/joseph-son-of-jacob-israel-was-imhotep-of-egyptian-history/

....

· Barriers to equating Joseph with Imhotep, The Egyptian Identity of Joseph son of Jacob, Who was Imhotep


Authors

Joseph, son of Jacob (Israel), was Imhotep, of Egyptian History


Egyptian History is consistent with the Bible

Joseph was the 11th son of Jacob, the Patriarch of Israel. Joseph was 30 years old when he became the sage or visier to Pharaoh and lead Egypt through seven years of famine. The Pharaohs became wealthy and powerful because of Joseph. Joseph brought up all the land of Egypt (except for that of the priest’s) and reduced the Egyptian people to servitude. He married the daughter of the High Priest in Heliopolis (Capital city ‘On’). He lived to the age of 110 and ensured the survival of the Israelites.

Egyptian history records a visier to Pharaoh Djoser of the third dynasty by the name of Imhotep who lived for 110 years and saved Egypt from a seven year famine and made Egypt very wealthy. He is said to have designed the first pyramid, been the first to used columns in architecture, performed operations and established the practice of embalming. He wrote many literary works and was the first to use papyrus.
Could Joseph and Imhotep have been the same person?

Joseph and Imhotep were the same person


Introduction

This article looks at the person of Joseph, son of Jacob, in the Bible, and whether or not there is any non-Biblical Egyptian historical or archeological evidence of his existence.
Joseph is responsible for saving Egypt from a seven year famine and may have built the massive underground silos that can be found in many cities of Egypt. [1] [2] [3] In particular, he may have built the silos associated with the first pyramid built in Egypt (The Step Pyramid which is part of the Djoser Pyramid complex at Saqqara, designed by Imhotep). [4] [5] [6] [7]
There are many similarities between the profile of Joseph and Imhotep. [8] [9] [10] [5] Imhotep is also credited with saving Egypt from a seven year famine after hearing of the Pharaoh’s dream. Imhotep, like Joseph, was a commoner with some divine connection and was placed second in charge of Egypt by the King (Netjerikhet). [8]
Joseph brought up all the land for Pharaoh by selling the grain he stored during the seven years that preceded the famine [11] ; a feat that could only have been performed once, early in Egypt’s history, and explains how the Pharaohs became so powerful and able to built the pyramids.
Given that Joseph was one of the Patriarchs of Israel, and figures very early in the Biblical record, less than 1000 years after the flood of Noah, it is quite possible that he may have figured in the early parts of Egyptian history, namely the Third Dynasty of Pharaoh Djoser. [9] [12] [13]
Until recently, the most compelling argument against Joseph and Imhotep being the same person, has been the discrepancy between the estimated times during which they lived. [4] [14]
In the last 50 years, evidence has accumulated to suggest that Egyptian dynasties may overlap and may not date back as far as was once thought. [15] [16] [17] [18] Egyptian records are not chronological. [12] Furthermore, the pyramids were probably constructed much later that many historians have estimated. [19]
If this “modern alignment” of the Egyptian dynasties is correct, it is highly likely that Joseph and Imhotep were the same person [20] [21] [22] [23] [18] and Egyptian History would be consistent with the Bible.
If it can be generally accepted that Joseph and Imhotep were the same person, this would give historians an anchor in history in order to further correlate the history of Egypt, Israel and Mesopotamia.

Biblical References to Joseph

References to Joseph can be found in the Book of Genesis in the Holy Bible, the Torah and The Koran.
These are the Holy scriptures of the Christian faith, Judaism and Islam respectively.
The story of Jospeh is told in Genesis Chapters 37-50.
Genesis is the first book of the Bible and no Biblical scholars would dispute the historical nature of this part of the Book.
Any suggestion that Joseph was a symbolic, mythical or a fictional character would be deeply offensive to these religions.

  • Biblical Genealogy

After the Flood [24] and the dispersion of Babel [25] , people spread out over all the Earth.
Terah set out from Ur of the Chaldeans with his Son Abraham to go to Canaan but stopped at Haran. [26]
This is where Abraham was called by God. God promised to make him into a great nation and to bless all nations through him. [27]
God made a covenant with Abraham and promised him the land of Canaan which his descendants would take possession of after serving as slaves in a foreign land (Egypt) for 400 years (4 generations). [28]
Abraham was to become the father of many nations centered around the middle east as we know it today.
He had Ishmael (Ishmaelites) to Hagar, his wife’s maid servant. [29] Ishmael became the Patriach of the Islamic religion.
Then at the age of 100 Abraham had Issac to his wife Sarai. [30]
It was to be thru Issac that God would fulfill his promise to Abraham and so Ishmael was sent away. [31]
Issac married Rebeka who bore Esau (the Edomites) and Jacob (the Israelites). Abraham had a third wife Keturah who bore many children who were sent to the middle east and became fathers of nations there too. [32]
Jacob eventually bore 12 sons and a daughter. The eleventh son was Joseph. Joseph was the first son of Rachael (Jacob’s second wife). [33] Jacob had an encounter with God one night and was renamed Israel. [34] His descendants (the Jews) became the Nation of Israel (from which comes Judaism) out of which came Christ (Christianity) with whom God would fulfill his promise to Abraham. [35]
Genealogy of Noah (according to the Bible)

Genealogy of Noah (according to the Bible)

Genealogy of Abraham (according to the Bible)

Genealogy of Abraham (according to the Bible)


  • Biblical History

In the Biblical account, (Genesis 37-50) Joseph was the first born Son of Rachael (Jacob’s second wife). Jacob (Israel) favored Joseph over his other children. Joseph had a dream that one day he would rule over his brothers. His brothers became jealous of him and so sold him to slave traders who took him to Egypt. [36] He was subsequently sold to Potiphar in Egypt as a slave and was subsequently wrongfuly imprisoned.
It was in prison where he came to the attention of Pharaoh through his cupbearer who informed Pharaoh of Joseph’s ability to interpret dreams by the power of God. Pharaoh needed counsel about his own dreams and was not able to find anybody from his own kingdom to help.
Joseph was able to tell Pharaoh the meaning of his dreams which fortold of a coming famine lasting seven years but preceded by seven years of abundance. Pharaoh made Joseph second in charge over his all his kingdom. During the seven years of abundance, Joseph was able to build silos in every city and store enough grain to feed the Nation during the seven years of famine that followed. [37]

  • Joseph’s achievements in Egypt

When Joseph was 30 yrs old, Pharaoh put him in charge of the whole land of Egypt. Pharaoh gave Joseph his signet ring, dressed him in fine linen and put a gold chain around his neck. He was given a chariot to ride around Egypt as second in command. Joseph’s name was changed to Zapheneth Paneah and he was given a wife Asenath (Daughter of Potiphera, priest of On). [1]
During the seven years of abundance, Joseph stored up huge quantities of grain in each city from the fields surrounding them. [2]
He had two sons to Asenath, Mannaseh & Ephraim. [38]
Joseph saved Egypt and Caanan by selling the people grain during the 7 year famine. When the people had run out of money, Joseph brought their livestock. When they had run out of livestock he brought the land titles. [3]
Joseph brought up all the land in Egypt for Pharaoh. The priests did not have to sell their land as Pharaoh gave them a supply of food. [11]
Joseph’s family were saved. [39] Jacob (Israel) and his eleven other sons along with their wives and servants were invited by Pharaoh to come and live in Egypt. [40] They settled in Rameses and became numerous in number. [41]
Jacob died and was afforded an Egyptian burial [42] after blessing his children and those of Joseph. [43] [44] Joseph reassures his brothers after Jacobs death. [45] Eventually Joseph dies at the age of 110 and is given an Egyptian style burial aswell. [46]
After 430 years passed, the Israelites numbered over 2 million. They were eventually lead out of Egypt by Moses through the Red Sea (the exodus). [47]

Is Joseph likely to have figured in Egyptian records?

If Joseph was placed second in charge of Egypt by Pharaoh, there should be some note of this in Egyptian records. [1]
Joseph helped to save Egypt and the surrounding nations from a famine lasting seven years. [2]
Joseph would have had to construct massive grain silos for storing grain in many Egyptian cities and indeed, massive silos can be found in many historical significant Egyptian cities today (eg Saqqara).
Joseph married the daugher of one of the High Priests in Egypt. [1] He saved his country from a seven year famine and brought up all the land of Egypt except for that of the priests who did not need to sell their land because Pharaoh supplied them with food. The people became loyal subjects of Pharaoh because of what Joseph had done. [3]
Joseph was, therefore, responsible for making the Pharaoh’s wealthy and powerful. [11]
Joseph served the Pharaohs from the age of thirty. [1] He died at the age of 110 years of age and was given a Royal Egyptian burial. [46] It is quite possible that he may have been involved with the design of the first and maybe the second pyramid.
His family, the descendants of Jacob (Israel), produced mud bricks and became numerous in number in the 430 years that they lived in Egypt. There were over 600 thousand adult males (not counting women and children) who were lead out of Egypt by Moses during a time of great disaster in Egypt. [47]
With a list of accomplishments like this, it would be hard to conceive that Joseph would not be mentioned in Egyptian heiroglyphics or memorialized some other way.

Where does Joseph fit into Egyptian History?

Estimates of dates have long been the common denominator used by archaeologists and historians alike when trying to piece together ancient history.
Various teams of archaeologist have used a number of different dating methods to estimate how old a particular artifact is. For example, the type of pottery that is predominant in a layer can be used to date the layer.
Assumptions behind various dating techniques are not alway right. This can sometimes lead to artifacts being incorrectly dated by as much as 1000 to 2000 years.
If history is pieced together based only upon the estimated dates of particular dynasties, the results can be quite erroneous and it will be little wonder why Egyptian and Hebrew history does not fit together and why no Egyptian equivalent of Joseph has been found using the dates traditionally ascribed to various Egyptian dynasties.
An increasing number of historians are now calling into question the dates of Egyptian dynasties. In particular, Sweeney [15] [21] [19] [48] , Velikovski [49] [50] [51] , Fry [52] [12] [53] [16] [54] [55] [56] [57] [58] [59] [20] , Reilly [13] [17] [60] [22] Ashton & Down [18] .
Using their revised dating system, the historical records of Israel and Egypt fit together much better and it is possible to identify likely correlates and contemporaries of important Biblical Characters.
Conventional wisdom which has been very reliant on dating methods has been unable to find any evidence that the Patriarchs of Israel lived in Egypt and have not found any possible candidates for Joseph because they are looking for evidence of him in the Hyksos dynasty which is estimated to have been around 1700BC according to conventional chronology. As a result, conventional wisdom states that Joseph and other Biblical figures were minor figures in Egypt that were not note worthy enough to have been memorialized in the heiroglyphic records and other monuments that have been uncovered.
Modern thinking using the revised chronology results in much clearer picture with the history Israel and Egypt lining up and matching archaeological records. Abraham is considered to be a contemporary of Menes. Imhotep is considered to be the Joseph of the Bible and Djoser is considered to be the Pharaoh that he served [13] [17] [21] [15] [52] [54] .
This would fit with the theory that Amenemhet III was the Pharaoh of Moses who oppressed the Israelites making them make mud bricks [18] . Also of note is that the pyramid of Amenemhet III was made of mud bricks containing straw. [18] Amenemhet III was the 6th Pharaoh of the 12th dynasty and lived 450 to 500 years after Pharaoh Djoser in the 3rd dynasty. [18] He had only daughters who had a son (Amenemhet IV) who disappeared before he could become King. It has been suggested that Amenemhet IV was Moses. [18]
The Exodus took place during the Reign of Neferhotep I during the 13th dynasty in 1445BC. He was the only Pharaoh of that dynasty [18]
The Hyksos (15th & 16th dynasties) which were contemporary with Joshua and the Judges, came to an end when King Saul destroyed the Amalekites (Hyksos) [18] [61]
Dynasty 17 was contemporary with dynasty 16. [18]
Amenhotep I and Thutmosis I of the 18th dynasty were contemporaries of David. [18] Hatshepsut was the Queen of Sheba who visited Solomon. [62] [63] Thutmosis III came to power during the reign of Jereboam and became the greatest Pharaoh of Egypt. [18]
‘Modern’ Chronology (Ashton & Down 2006) [18]
DateDynastyEgyptContemporary_in_Israel
2080BC1stMenesAbraham
1900BC3rdDjoser_+_ImhotepJoseph
1531BC12thAmenemhet_III (6th_Pharaoh)Moses
1445BC13thNeferhotep IThe Exodus (Moses)
1405 -1021BC15th_&_16thHyksosJoshua to Saul
1018BC18thAmenhotep I & Thutmosis IKing David
950BC18thHatshepsut [Queen of Sheba]Solomon
929BC18thThutmosis IIIJereboam

Why is it so hard to piece together Egyptian records?

The Egyptians suffered great losses at the time of the Exodus and may not have wanted to remember what Joseph and his family had achieved during their 400 year stay in Egypt. This may be one reason why it is very difficult to find historical information about the exploits of the Israelites in Egypt.
This may also been the reason that the second pyramid designed by Imhotep was not completed.
Another reason why it is difficult to find historical information is because much of it was lost or destroyed by various seiges, conquests, natural distasters and even erosion over the centuries.
Egyptian records are written as qlyphs (pictures) in stone. They have a number of limitations – you need to know ‘the code’ ie what they mean. Pronunciation is not indicated as with Greek and English and there is no time stamp. The art of interpreting them (heiroglyphics)has been somewhat lost.

Similarities between Joseph and Imhotep

Imhotep – Egyptian records
Joseph – Bible
  • Imhotep is appointed Administrator by Pharaoh Djoser during the periods of seven years famine and seven years of bountiful harvests [8]
  • Joseph is appointed Administrator to Pharaoh for the seven years of plenty then of famine
  • Minister to the King of Lower Egypt [8]
  • Pharaoh .. made him ruler over all the land of Egypt
  • Administrator of the Great Palace [8]
  • Thou shalt be over my house
  • Not of royal blood; attained position by ability [8]
  • From another nation and religion, not of royal blood, attained position by ability
  • Not appointed by Pharaoh Djoser until he had reigned for some time [8]
  • Appointed well after Pharaoh ruled Egypt
  • Given the status of “son” to Pharaoh [8]
  • Granted the status of “son” to Pharaoh
  • High Priest in Heliopolis [8]
  • Married to Asenath, daughter of Poti-Pherah, High Priest in Heliopolis – by custom, would succeed father-in-law
  • Builder and architect [8]
  • Builder of grain storehouses such as at Sakkara step-pyramid
  • Exalted by Pharaoh Djoser as of godly character [8]
  • And Pharaoh said, ‘a man in whom the spirit of God is!’
  • “I need advice from God” [8]
  • Noted as saying, “It is not in me; God shall give Pharaoh an answer”
  • Had great medical skill – was compared to the Greek God of Healing [8]
  • Had doctors under his authority – worked by miracles, dreams and signs from God
  • Decided the tax rate during the seven years of famine; also not to apply to priests [8]
  • Decided the tax rate during the seven years of famine; also not to apply to priests
  • Realizes when he is dying – dies at age 110 [8]
  • Realizes when he is dying – dies at age 110

Who was Imhotep?

Imhotep was a most interesting figure in the Egyptian culture, his name means “the one who comes in peace”. He served Djoser, the third dynasty king, he was the vizier to the pharaoh and they say that he was the high priest to the sun god Ra. [64]
Imhotep is attributed with being the first person in history to be an acting physician, he was also the first architect, he was a poet and also a philosopher. After his death he was given the status of a deity, he was only one of a very few commoners to ever be given that kind of an honor.
[64]
He is thought to be the architect of the first Pyramid; the step pyramid at Saqqara. [64]
He is also credited with the use of columns in architecture. [64]
He is known as the founder of Egyptian medicine, and he is famous for not incorporating magic into his medical treatments, he diagnosed and treated over two hundred diseases, he extracted medicine from plants and he is also known to have performed operations and dentist work. He knew the circulation of the blood system and he knew where each vital organ was placed and what its uses were. [64]
He became the god of medicine and healing, when the Greeks invaded Egypt they worshiped him and built him temples because they saw in him their own god of healing named Asclepius. [64]
Imhotep was also the first person known to use the papyrus scroll. He may have actually invented it! [64]
Among other things Imhotep is also attributed to the prediction and prevention of a seven year famine that came upon the land, he predicted the famine from a dream the pharaoh Djoser had, in this dream the god of the Nile spoke to the pharaoh, and Imhotep was the only one that could interpret the dream. [64]

Could Joseph and Imhotep have been the same person?

The Roman-Jewish historian, Josephus, quotes the writings of Manetho, Egyptian historian: “During [the] reign of .. Pharaoh Djoser, 3rd Egyptian dynasty, lived Imhotep .. [with a] reputation among Egyptians like the Greek God of medicine – [Manetho even wondered] whether Imhotep could have been an actual person .. [because he had] “so many outstanding qualities and talents .. a very special person [who] appears in the history of Egypt.” On the foundations of the Step Pyramid in Sakkara was carved the name of Pharaoh Djoser and “.. Imhotep, Chancellor of the King of Lower Egypt, Chief under the King, Administrator of the Great Palace, Hereditary Lord, High Priest of Heliopolis, Imhotep the Builder..”. [8] [65]
Joseph arrived in Egypt as a young man and married Asenath, the daughter of Potipherah, the priest of On. [1]
This information precludes the theory that Joseph lived during Hyksos rule in Egypt. On or An was the ancient capital of Heliopolis (As-t Tem). Some claim that Egyptians also believed in One Great God who was never represented in their art work. Only his attributes, functions as Creator, Teacher and Healer were known as the neter or neteru. The symbolism surrounding Egyptian deities then is different from this One Great God, in whose image man was made, in that it scales our world and the universe to our dimensions so man can grasp it. The Egyptian name for this `One Great God’ is neter, probably an echo or more distant memory of the biblical Creator God of Abraham, Issac and Jacob. [66]
Both Imhotep and Joseph imposed a 20% (one fifth) tax on the people with the exemption of the priests. [54]
Moeller refers to an inscription on the island of Sihiel, near the first cataract of the Nile, which actually links Imhotep to the key biblical element of the Joseph story – telling of Pharaoh Djoser in the 18th year of his reign. The inscription states “seven meagre years and seven rich years”. Commenting on the inscription, Moeller writes, “Pharaoh Djoser asks Imhotep to help him with the coming seven years of famine. All the biblical components of the story are there, and there is a similar inscription on the island of Philae in the Nile.” (This is exactly as in the Bible with Joseph, except for listing the “meagre” years before the years of plenty. Note: The famine years were, of course, the event of significance, saving everyone from starvation and bringing in much wealth to Egypt – it is noted that the manuscript was written a thousand years after the occurrences.) [67] [8]
Pharaoh renamed Joseph ‘Zapeneth Peneah’ [1] which means “master of the school of learning” [66] or “Man to whom secrets are revealed” [54] .
It is also interesting to note that circumcision was widely practiced among Egyptians from the third dynasty onward. Although Abraham did visit Egypt, it seems more likely that this practice was introduced by Joseph-Imhotep in the third dynasty. [54]
Egyptian records show that before Imhotep, the bodies of Egyptian royalty were not embalmed. Instead, they were entombed in early Egyptian structures called mastabas, (or mastabahs), oblong structures with flat roofs and sloping sides built over the opening of a mummy chamber or burial pit . [54]
Djoser appears to be the first king to have be embalmed, [54] Jacob (Israel) was embalmed by Joseph and buried in a coffin and Joesph himself was embalmed and given a royal Egyptian burial. [46] [42] The Biblical account suggests that only Joseph’s bones were preserved as was the practice in the early dynasties of the Old Kingdom. Preservation of the whole body was not practiced until the Era of King Tut (New Kingdom). [54]
Extremely noteworthy regarding Imhotep-Joseph is that the mummified bodies of neither have ever been found. The known facts regarding the burials of Imhotep and Joseph also strongly support the thesis that they were the same person: [8]
Both died at age 110. [8] [46]
Imhotep’s coffin in Sakkara – with innumeral Ibis birds mummified in the adjoining galleries (Imhotep was called “Ibis” because of his reputation for healing – a large number of Ibis birds were sacrificed to him at his funeral in Sakkara); many clay vessels bearing the seal of Pharaoh Djoser were near the coffin; and the coffin is oriented to the North, not East, and is empty. [8]
Joseph would have been buried at Sakkara, his coffin orientated to the North – indicating he did not believe in the gods of the Egyptians (who were buried facing East, the rising sun); the coffin would also be empty as Joseph’s bones would have been taken by Moses with the Hebrews during the Exodus. [8] [46]

Could Pharaoh Djoser (King Netjerikhet) be the Pharaoh of Joseph?

The ‘correct alignment’ of Israel’s and Egypt’s history will allow contemporary fragments of information to be linked together to build up a clear picture of ancient history. Combining the records of Egypt, Israel and Mesopotamia will help to fill in the gaps in each nations’ record.
Evidence is now accumulating to suggest that Egyptian dynasties may overlap and may not date back as far as was once thought. [15] [16] [17] [18] [66]
Dynasty 2 is considered contemporary with dynasty 3. [18] There was no first intermediate period. The dark ages of the first intermediate period have been confused with the dark ages of the second intermediate period. [18]
Dynasties 7-10 have been identified with 15-16 and Dynasty 17 was contemporary with dynasty 16. [18]
Egyptian history, therefore, does not date back as far as was once thought (3000BC – 5000BC) as per the Conventional Chronology. [18] [50] [51] [49] [21] [13] [17] [52] [12] [53] [16] [54] [66]
The first Egyptian dynasty is now considered to have started around 2100BC and the Great Flood is considered to have been around 2300-2400BC. [18]
The Exodus occured just after the end of the 12th dynasty in 1445BC. [66] [18]
Any Egyptian dates before the 12th dynasty are considered quite speculative and are only approximations [18]
This ‘Modern Alignment’ of the Dynasties fits the Biblical account and also the records of Mesopotamia.
The ‘Modern Alignment’ of the Dynasties provides the answers to the major objection to Joseph and Imhotep being the same person (namely the mismatching dates) and by the same token makes it highly likely that Pharaoh Djoser was the Pharaoh of Joseph.
While Sweeney points out that Abraham was a contemporary of Menes who were patriarchs of their respective civilizations some time after a catestrophic destruction [21] , he has probably over corrected the dates which are far too short even for Biblical events.
If it is agreed that Joseph was Imhotep and he served Pharaoh Djoser (Zozer) of the Third dynasty, it does not follow that the identity of Moses and the Pharaoh’s he was contemporary with will be agreed as there is not universal agreement about which dynasties to identify and which dynasties ran in parallel. [58] [66] [19] [18] [17]
‘Conventional’ Chronology [21]
DateEgyptIsrael
3000BCMenes (First dynasty displays strong mesopotamian influence)Djoser and Imhotep (Famine crisis solved when Imhotep interprets Djoser’s dream)
2000BCFirst Intermediate period(Age of disturbance in nature and general lawlessness)Abraham (migrates from mesopotamia and introduces some of the basic civiliation to Egypt)Joseph (Famine crisis in Egypt solved when Joseph interprets Pharaoh’s dream)
1000BCMoses leads the Israelites to freedom amidst violent upheavals of nature
‘Revised’ Chronology (Sweeney 1997) [21]
DateEgyptIsraelMesopotamia
1300+BCEarly_Badarian‘Ubaid
1300BCCatestrophic_DestructionCatestrophic_DestructionCatestrophic_Destruction
1200BCLate_Bedarian_and_GerzeanKhirbet_KerakJamdat_Nasr(Early_Literacy)
1100-
1000BC
Destruction episodeDestruction episodeDestruction episode
1000BCMenes (Early Dynastic Age)Abraham(Early Dynastic Age)
900BCDjoser and ImhotepJoseph
800BCDestruction episodeDestruction episodeDestruction episode
800BCPyramid AgeAge of the JudgesAkkadian Age
700BCHyksos epochSaulSargon I
‘Modern’ Chronology (Ashton & Down 2006) [18]
Date Dynasty Egyptian_PharaohContemporary_in_Israel
2080BC1stMenesAbraham
1900BC3rdDjoser_+_ImhotepJoseph
1531BC12thAmenemhet_III (6th_Pharaoh)Moses
1445BC13thNeferhotep IThe Exodus (Moses)
1405 -1021BC15th_&_16thHyksosJoshua to Saul
1018BC18thAmenhotep I & Thutmosis IKing David
950BC18thHatshepsut [Queen of Sheba]Solomon
929BC18thThutmosis IIIJereboam

What implications does this have for Egyptian History?

If the ‘modern alignment’ of the Egyptian Dynasties is correct, Joseph can be identified with Imhotep and Egyptian history will be consistent with the Bible.
Pharaoh recognised Joseph’s divine inspiration and appointed him to be in charge of Egypt. Joseph built silos to store grain and so saved Egypt from a seven year famine. He acquired all the land of Egypt (other than the priest’s) for Pharaoh by selling grain. The Pharaohs became wealthy and powerful and the people of Egypt became his subjects. Joseph’s family was invited to live in Egypt (Rameses). [3] [11]
Joseph, therefore, saved his family and protected the Israelites as they grew to become a nation in Egypt. [45]
Djoser was the second Pharaoh of the 3rd dynasty of Egypt and came about three or four generations after Menes who was the Pharaoh of the 1st dynasty of Egypt and a contemporary of Abraham. [18] [21] [15]
Joseph came three generations after Abraham and was contemporary with Djoser (1900BC) . After his death he was deified because of his achievements. As King Netjeriket of the third Egyptian dynasty was also known by the name ‘Pharaoh Djoser’, it is possible that this name means ‘Pharaoh of Joseph’.
The Israelites stayed in Egypt 430 years. This takes us to the end of the 12th and beginning of the 13th dynasty which is when the Exodus occurred. (1445BC) [18]
It is unlikely that Joseph was some inconspicuous person in the 18th dynasty of Hyksos as is commonly held by people who adhere to the ‘conventional alignment’ of Egyptian dynasties.
What’s more, if the ‘modern alignment’ is correct, the Hebrew influence of Egyptian culture will be re-established. The first pyramid would have been designed by a Hebrew. The Hebrew God can be credited for saving Egypt from a seven year famine and giving the Pharaoh’s their power, wealth and the means to build the other pyramids. The designer of the first pyramid will, once again, be seen to be a servant of the God of Abraham, Issac and Jacob, even though the pyramids later became objects of pagan worship and Imhotep was deified long after his death by the Greeks.
When the Israelites left Egypt, Joseph’s association with the God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob was forgotten and the pyramids became symbols of pagan gods.
With the aid of hind sight it can be seen how the designer of the first pyramid, the savior of the Egyptian people and the man responsible for the Pharaoh’s power, known as Imhotep, would be deified some 1400 years after his death once his connection with the God of Abraham, Issac and Jacob had been lost and forgotten.
The first pyramids, which were made of cut limestone, were built by the Egyptian people who had sold their land to Pharaoh and become his subjects.
After Joseph’s death, the Israelites were given the task of making mud bricks. [68] [69] Interestingly, the core of the Pyramid of Amenemhet III is made of mud bricks containing straw. [18] Amenemhet III was the 6th Pharaoh of the 12th Egyptian dynasty which preceeded the Exodus in 1445BC. [18]
Moses was forced to flee Egypt and go to Midian after killing an Israelite official. During that period, the Pharaoh died. [70] When he returned to Egypt, there was a new Pharaoh in power (possibly Neferhotep I of the 13th Dynasty). [18]
The Hyksos dynasties (14th & 15th dynasties) started after the Exodus, spanned the period of the Judges and was finally ended by Saul when he defeated the Amelekites. [18] [61]

What implications does this have for Israel and Christianity?

If Joseph was Imhotep, then Bible History is consistent with Egyptian history.
This will mean that there is archaeological evidence that the Patriarchs of Israel lived in Egypt.
Archaeological evidence for Israel in Arabia ⁄ Midian (Jabel el Lawz) in combination with the above would corroborate the Biblical account of the Exodus.
Joseph saved his family and protected the Israelites and allowed them to multiply in numbers so that they could fulfill what God had planned; namely to return to the land of Canaan and to take possession of it after spending 430 years in Egypt and 40 years in the Wilderness. [28]

What implications does this have for Literature, Medicine and Architecture?

If Joseph was Imhotep, this would make Joseph the father of medicine, the first architect to build with stone and use columns and the inventor of the papyrice and the first to use it (to write medical and non-medical literary works). [71] [72] [73] [74] [6] [75]
He probably served more than one pharaoh and appears to have designed at least two pyramids and several buildings that utilize columns. He was given the name Pathotep by a later pharaoh that he served. [54]
Imhotep may have invented the embalming techniques used to preserve the bodies of Egyptian Pharaohs. He became the first pathologist. He was known as the ‘Son of Ptah’ (or son of Path). [54] Hundreds of years after his death, he became deified and was known as the god Path. [54]
Not only was Pathotep’s name derived from that of the god Path, but our modern word, ‘Pathology’, was also derived from and bears his name. [54]

Summary: Joseph and Imhotep are the same person

There is such a strong match between the profile of Joseph and Imhotep that many historians, theologians and archaeologists have suggested that they are one in the same person.
There were only so many non royal, second in charge visiers who saved Egypt from a 7 year famine by interpreting Pharaohs dreams (with the power of God), imposed a 20% tax, brought up all the land of Egypt for Pharaoh (except for that of the priests), lived to the age of 110 and were embalmed when they died. – Imhotep & Joseph
Imhotep was also the High Priest of Heliopolis. Jospeh married the daughter of the high priest of On (the capital of Heliopolis) !
Until recently, the main case for not believing Joseph and Imhotep to be the same person, has been the considerable discrepancy between the estimated dates of their existance by as much as 1000 years!
Egyptian records are far from complete. They are not chronological and the exact way that fragments fit together is by no means certain.
In the Last 50 years, historians have realized that several Egyptian dynasties have been counted twice and some ran in parallel. The result is that Egyptian history can be substantially contracted, therefore eliminating the discrepancy in the estimated dates of Joseph and Imhotep.
This modern understanding of the Egyptian dynasties means that Joseph almost certainly was Imhotep and Egyptian History is consistent with the Bible.
If it can be generally accepted that Joseph and Imhotep were the same person, this would give historians an anchor in history in order to further correlate the history of Egypt, Israel and Mesopotamia.

Suggested Reading

1. J. Ashton & D. Down, Unwrapping the pharaohs. how Egyptian archaeology confirms the Biblical timeline, New Leaf Publishing Group (Master books), 2006. ISBN 978-0-89051-468-9 ISBN 0-89051-468-2 http://masterbooks.net
2. H. Bible, “Jacob bore 12 sons,” Genesis chapter 29-32,
3. H. Bible—”Keturah’s children sent away to Middle East,” Genesis 25:1-4,
4. H. Bible—”Abrahams children to be reckoned through Isaac,” Genesis 21:12,
5. H. Bible—”Ishmael sent away – Isaac the child of promise,” Genesis 21:8-13,
6. H. Bible—”Isaac born to Sarai,” Genesis Chapter 21,
7. H. Bible—”Ishmael born to Hagar,” Genesis Chapter 16,
8. H. Bible—”God’s covenant with Abraham,” Genesis Chapters 15 & 17,
9. H. Bible—”Call of Abraham,” Genesis Chapter 12,
10. H. Bible—”Terah sets out from Ur,” Genesis 11:27-32,
11. H. Bible—”The dispersion after Babel,” Genesis Chapter 11,
12. H. Bible—”The Flood,” Genesis Chapter 6,
13. H. Bible—”The Biblical account of Jospeh,” Genesis chapter 37-50,
14. H. Bible—”Jacob renamed Israel,” Genesis 32:22-32,
15. H. Bible—”Jacob favours Joseph,” Genesis chapter 37,
16. H. Bible—”Joseph sold into slavery and taken to Egypt,” Genesis 37:12-36,
17. H. Bible—”Joseph falsely accused and imprisoned in Egypt,” Genesis 39:1-23,
18. H. Bible—”Joseph able to interpret dreams,” Genesis 40:1-23,
19. H. Bible—”Joseph recognised by Pharaoh,” Genesis 41:1-40,
20. H. Bible—”The Exodus,” Exodus 12:31-42,
21. H. Bible—”Joseph reassures his brothers afer Jacob’s death,” Genesis 50:15-21,
22. H. Bible—”Jacob dies,” Genesis 49:29 -50:14,
23. H. Bible—”Jacob blesses his sons,” Genesis chapter 49,
24. H. Bible—”Jacob blesses Joseph’s children,” Genesis chapter 48,
25. H. Bible—”Pharaoh gives Jacob the land of Goshen,” Genesis Chapter 45,
26. H. Bible—”Joseph’s brothers go to Egypt to buy grain,” Genesis Chapters 42-44,
27. H. Bible—”Death of Joseph,” Genesis 50:22-26,
28. H. Bible—”Jacob moves to Egypt and settles in Rameses,” Genesis Chapter 46:1-47:12,
29. H. Bible—”Joseph buys up all the land of Egypt for Pharaoh,” Genesis 47:18-22,
30. H. Bible—”Joseph saves Egypt by selling grain,” Genesis 47:13-17,
31. H. Bible—”Joseph has two sons; Ephraim and Mannaseh,” Genesis 41:50-52,
32. H. Bible—”Joseph stores up huge quantities of grain in Egyptian cities,” Genesis 41:47-49,
33. H. Bible—”Pharaoh puts joseph in charge of all Egypt,” Genesis chapter 41:41-46,
34. H. Bible—”The Queen of Sheba visits Solomon,” 1Chron 9:1-12,
35. H. Bible—”The Queen of Sheba visits Solomon,” 1Kings 10:1-13,
36. H. Bible—”Saul destroys the Amalekites,” 1Samuel 15:2-9,
37. H. Bible__”Moses flees to Midian and Pharaoh eventually dies” Exodus 2:11-25,
38. H. Bible, “The Israelites oppressed,” Exodus 1:1-22,
39. H. Bible—”Pharaoh makes Israelites find own straw to make mud bricks,” Exodus 5:1-21,
40. “The Wall Chart of World History – From earliest times to the present” 1998 Bracken Books ISBN 1-86256-306-3

References:

1. H. Bible, “Pharaoh puts Joseph in charge of all Egypt,” Genesis chapter 41:41-46,
2. H. Bible—”Joseph stores up huge quantities of grain in Egyptian cities,” Genesis 41:47-49,
3. H. Bible—”Joseph saves Egypt by selling grain,” Genesis 47:13-17,
4. NationMaster.com, “Statemaster – Encyclopedia: Imhotep,” , statemaster.com, 2009.
6. M. Millmore, “The Step Pyramid at Saqqara,” , http://www.eyelid.co.uk, 2008.
9. E. Sweeney, “Were Joseph and Imhotep of Egypt The same man?,” THE GENESIS OF ISRAEL AND EGYPT, B. E. Sweeny (Editor), 2001.
10. B. Rhodes, “Joseph and Imhotep,” , http://the-red-thread.net/, 2009.
11. H. Bible, “Joseph buys up all the land of Egypt for Pharaoh,” Genesis 47:18-22,
12. D. Fry, “Hebrew sages of ancient Egypt – time calibrators,” Hebrew Sages of Ancient Egypt II, 2004.
13. J. Reilly, “Displaced dynasties,” Dysplaced Dynasties, 2009.
14. G. Byers, “Israel in Egypt,” , http://www.biblearchaeology.org, 2008.
17. J. Reilly, “The exodus and beyond chapter 3: Joseph & Moses,” The Exodus and Beyond, 2009.
19. E. Sweeney, The pyramid age, ages in alignment series, Algora Publishing, 2007.
21. E. Sweeney, The Genesis of Israel and Egypt, Janus Publishing Company Limited, 1997. ISBN 978-1857563504
23. R. Wyatt, “Joseph was Imhotep of Egypt,” , Wyatt Archaelogical Research, 1994.
24. H. Bible, “The Flood,” Genesis Chapter 6,
25. H. Bible—”The dispersion after Babel,” Genesis Chapter 11,
26. H. Bible—”Terah sets out from Ur,” Genesis 11:27-32,
27. H. Bible—”Call of Abraham,” Genesis Chapter 12,
28. H. Bible—”God’s covenant with Abraham,” Genesis Chapters 15 & 17,
29. H. Bible—”Ishmael born to Hagar,” Genesis Chapter 16,
30. H. Bible—”Isaac born to Sarai,” Genesis Chapter 21,
31. H. Bible—”Ishmael sent away – Isaac the child of promise,” Genesis 21:8-13,
32. H. Bible—”Keturah’s children sent away to Middle East,” Genesis 25:1-4,
33. H. Bible—”Jacob bore 12 sons,” Genesis chapter 29-32,
34. H. Bible—”Jacob renamed Israel,” Genesis 32:22-32,
35. H. Bible—”Abrahams children to be reckoned through Isaac,” Genesis 21:12,
36. H. Bible—”Jacob favours Joseph,” Genesis chapter 37,
37. H. Bible—”The Biblical account of Jospeh,” Genesis chapter 37-50,
38. H. Bible—”Joseph has two sons; Ephraim and Mannaseh,” Genesis 41:50-52,
39. H. Bible—”Joseph’s brothers go to Egypt to buy grain,” Genesis Chapters 42-44,
40. H. Bible—”Jacob moves to Egypt and settles in Rameses,” Genesis Chapter 46:1-47:12,
41. H. Bible—”Pharaoh gives Jacob the land of Goshen,” Genesis Chapter 45,
42. H. Bible—”Jacob dies,” Genesis 49:29 -50:14,
43. H. Bible—”Jacob blesses Joseph’s children,” Genesis chapter 48,
44. H. Bible—”Jacob blesses his sons,” Genesis chapter 49,
45. H. Bible—”Joseph reassures his brothers afer Jacob’s death,” Genesis 50:15-21,
46. H. Bible—”Death of Joseph,” Genesis 50:22-26,
47. H. Bible—”The Exodus,” Exodus 12:31-42, .
48. Empire of Thebes or Ages In chaos revisited (ages in alignment), Algora Publishing, 2006.
49. I. Velikovski, Worlds in collision, London and New York, 1950.
50. I. Velikovski—Ages in chaos, London and New York, 1953.
51. I. Velikovski—Earth in upheaval, 1956.
52. D. Fry, “Hebrew sages of ancient Egypt II,” 2009.
53. D. Fry—”Hebrew sages of ancient Egypt II The birth of Egypt,” Hebrew Sages of Ancient Egypt II, 2004.
57. D. Fry—”Hebrew sages of ancient Egypt – Egypts weather changes,” Hebrew Sages of Ancient Egypt, 2009.
60. J. Reilly—”The Exodus and beyond chapter 2: The Patriarchal Age,” The Exodus and Beyond, 2009.
61. H. Bible, “Saul destroys the Amalekites,” 1Samuel 15:2-9,
62. H. Bible, “The queen of Sheba visits Solomon,” 1Kings 10:1-13,
63. H. Bible—”The queen of Sheba visits Solomon,” 1Chron 9:1-12,
65. W. Whiston, The works of Josephus complete and unabridged, New Updated Edition, Hendrikson Publishers, 1987. ISBN 0-913573-86-8 ISBN 1-56563-167-6
67. L. Moeller, The case for the Exodus, .
68. H. Bible, “The Israelites oppressed,” Exodus 1:1-22,
70. H. Bible, “Moses flees to Midian and Pharaoh eventually dies,” Exodus 2:11-25,
72. Britannica, “Imhotep,” , http://www.britannica.com, 2009.
73. R. Strachan, “Imhotep,” , http://www.mnsu.edu/emuseum/, 2005.
74. K. Matthews, “Imhotep,” , http://www.greatbuildings.com, 2008.
75. Wikipedia, “Imhotep,” , http://en.wikipedia.org, 2009.

Wednesday, September 11, 2013

Adam the High Priest in the Paradise Temple








© Margaret Barker 2010



The story of Adam and the garden of Eden is one of the best known and yet least understood parts of

the Bible. It sets out the biblical teaching on the nature of human beings, and all too often has been

read as no more than the story of the fall. The familiar talking snake and the missing rib which have

caused such problems belong in the pre-phisosphical culture of ancient Israel, and an over-literal

reading of the text can obscure not only its profound insights but also its importance in the

framework of the New Testament.

Adam and Eden are the beginning and the end of the great story of the Bible. Returning to Eden was

an important part of Christian teaching from the beginning; paradise was regained when one entered

the Church. Cyril of Jerusalem told the newly baptised that he was leading them by the hand ‘into

the brighter and more fragrant meadow of paradise before us’....(

First Lecture on the Mysteries, 1).



In the New Testament, Jesus was described as the last Adam, the second Adam (1 Cor.15.45-7) and

he was also described as the great high priest (Heb.4.14). Adam and the high priest, as we shall see,

were the same figure. Jesus promised his faithful followers that they would once again eat from the

tree of life in the paradise of God (Rev.2.7). The story in the New Testament reverses the story of

Adam in Eden, and the Church’s claim to be paradise is rooted in the ancient belief that the original

temple represented the garden of Eden.

Paradise,

pardes, is not a Hebrew word, and when it is found in the Hebrew Bible, English



translations usually give something other than ‘paradise’:

forest (Neh.2.8), park (Eccles 2.5) or



orchard


(Song 4.13-15). In the LXX, the LORD planted a paradise, an enclosed garden, in Edem [not



Eden, Gen.2.8] The original Hebrew word Eden can mean either ‘delight’ or ‘plain’, so Eden could

have been a garden on a plain, or a garden of delight. The prophet Ezekiel, a priest who had known

the first temple (Ezek.1.3), described Eden as the mountain garden of the gods, the

’elohim



(Ezek.28.13-14), and so the meaning ‘plain’ would not have been appropriate for his Eden. ‘Delight’

fits better as the meaning of Eden, especially since Eden was used as an image for fertility. Isaiah,

for example, prophesied of Zion ‘I will make her wilderness like Eden, her desert like the garden of

the L

ORD (Isa.51.3); and Ezekiel prophesied that the desolate land would become like the garden of



Eden (Ezek.36.35). In the L

XX, Isaiah’s Eden was translated as ‘paradise’ and Ezekiel’s as ‘garden



of delight/ luxury’.

The Genesis Eden was the garden where Yahweh of the Elohim [‘the L

ORD God’] walked. It was a



place of trees and rivers, of cherubim and an evil snake. The L

ORD God set the man there, and



caused every tree to grow that is pleasant to the sight and good for food, as well as the the tree of

knowledge and the tree of life. When Adam and Eve were cast out, cherubim and a flaming sword

were set to guard the gate of the garden. Nothing in the story as told in Genesis has any obvious link

to the temple. In Ezekiel’s Eden, however, the figure who was driven out was a high priest, and his



2



Eden was probably earlier than the more familiar garden in Genesis. Ezekiel’s Eden was ‘the garden

of the gods’,

’elohim, on the holy mountain of the gods/God (Ezek.28.12-19). The figure addressed



in his lament, seemingly the king of Tyre, is both masculine and feminine, and it had walked among

the stones of fire, or possibly the sons of fire, before it was thrown down from the mountain garden

because it had become proud and corrupted its wisdom.

The rest of the description is almost opaque, and the problems of the Hebrew are considerable. It is

not clear whether the person Ezekiel addressed

was the guardian anointed cherub, or was with the



cherub, but it is clear that the key figure in Ezekiel’s Eden became Adam in the more familiar

version of the story. [We shall return to the King of Tyre.] It is also clear that the figure in Ezekiel’s

Eden was remembered as a high priest. It was dressed in precious stones: carnelian, topaz, jasper,

chrysolite, beryl, onyx, sapphire carbuncle, emerald - nine different stones, according to the Hebrew

text. The Greek text, however, has twelve stones which correspond exactly to those worn by the

high priest, both in name and in the position they were set in his breastplate (L

XX Exod.28.17-20).



Either the difficult Hebrew text has lost three precious stones, or the Greek translator has added three

in order to make clear that the figure driven from Ezekiel’s Eden was a high priest. Whether it

was a



cherub or had been ‘with the cherub’, this ‘King of Tyre’ had been in a heavenly place.

Another pattern corroborates the temple tradition that the original Adam was a high priest. When

Moses on Sinai was commanded to make the tabernacle, he had to replicate on earth what he had

seen in his mountain-top vision (Exod.25.8-9, 40). Later texts indicate that what Moses had seen

was not a heavenly temple - although some do say that that is what he saw. Moses’ vision was

the



six days of creation


, which he had seen when he was within the cloud of glory for six days



(Exod.24.15-16). This vision is now the opening of the first book of Moses, Genesis chapter 1. A

comparison of the six days of creation and the stages of erecting the tabernacle (Exod.40.16-33)

show that each day of creation was represented by one item of tabernacle or temple furnishing. The

sixth day, when Adam was created, corresponded to the laver of water in which the high priests

purified themselves before approaching the altar. Thus the creation of Adam represented the high

priesthood. This pattern of correspondences is a complex and fascinating topic, but one that we

cannot explore in detail today. Note, however, that Adam as the original high priest was a widely

based and widely known temple tradition.

The temple itself was a built as a paradise place. The great hall of Solomon’s temple [corresponding

to the nave of a western church] was decorated with carvings of gourds and open flowers, cherubim

and palm trees (1 Kgs 6.18, 29). The great bronze pillars were decorated with pomegranates and

lily-work (1 Kgs 7.15-22). When the measuring angel showed Ezekiel a vision of how the restored

temple should be, he saw a temple on a high mountain (Ezek.40.2), with cherubim and palm trees

carved on the walls of the great hall (Ezek.41.15-20). He saw a river flowing from the temple, just

as rivers had flowed from Eden (Ezek.47.1-12), and other prophets too looked forward to the time

when waters would flow from the temple (Joel 3.18; Zech.14.8). The righteous were described as

trees in the house of the L

ORD, a pointless metaphor if there had been no trees in the temple, albeit



carved in the wood (Ps. 92.13).

Various purges of the temple show other Eden items used in worship: Hezekiah broke in pieces a

bronze serpent that had been venerated with incense since time immemorial (2 Kgs 18.4), although



3



the text does not say that the serpent was in the temple; and when Josiah purged the temple, he

burned the chariot of the sun [Hebrew has plural but Greek is singular] which was probably the great

throne of the L

ORD in the holy of holies (2 Kgs 23.11), another feature of the later traditions that link



the temple to Paradise. According to the Enoch tradition, when the L

ORD came to Paradise, he rested



under the tree of life (

2 Enoch 8.3), and the Greek version of the Life of Adam and Eve says that



when he returned to Paradise, seated on the chariot of cherubim, all the plants came into bloom, and

the throne was set by the tree of life (

Apocalypse of Moses 22.3-4).



The temple as Eden was the setting of the Book of Revelation, where St John described the heavenly

city itself as a huge holy of holies (Rev.21.15-16), and so there was no need of a further temple there

(Rev.21.22). In the holy of holies St John saw the tree of life and the heavenly throne, and from the

holy of holies flowed the river of the water of life (Rev.22.1-2). The risen L

ORD promised to his



faithful followers that they would have access again to the tree of life (Rev.2.7), and St John saw

them standing before the throne and the tree of life (Rev.22.3-4) – exactly as described in the other

texts. They were restored to Eden whence Adam had been banished, but in fact they were standing

in the holy of holies.

There are two accounts in Genesis of the creation of Adam: God [or the

’elohim] resolved to create



Adam ‘according to our invisible heavenly form, as our material image’ (Gen.1.26, translating

literally; ‘as’ c.f Exod. 6.3 as El Shadddai). Adam was created male and female. The second

account has Yahweh of the Elohim (the L

ORD God), form the man from dust and then breathe into



the man the breath of life so that the man became a living being (Gen.2.7). Breathing into a statue

was a well known ritual for bringing it to life as the dwelling place of the god it represented, and all

the Targums agree that breathing into Adam meant giving him the power of speech. The image of

the beast was brought to life in this way in the Book of Revelation and given the power of speech

(Rev.13.15).

In each Genesis story, Adam was created as male-and female, and only later, after being set in the

garden as high priest, was Adam separated into distinct male and female beings. He was set in the

garden ‘to till and to keep’- the usual translation - but both these words have a temple meaning

(Gen.2.15), and Adam was understood to be a high priest even though that is not explicit. ‘Till’

‘bd,



was also the technical term for temple service, and ‘keep’,

šmr, meant to preserve the tradition. The



traditional Jewish interpretations did not think this was a command about gardening. The debate

was: did it mean serve for six days and then preserve the Sabbath, or serve God and perform the

sacred duties (

Genesis Rabbah XVI.5).



Apart from the biblical accounts, there were many stories about Adam and Eden, some of which

echo material in the Hebrew Bible and so may well have been known to its writers. They confirm

that the temple was Eden. Amongst texts known in the time of Jesus, the

Book of Jubilees, an



alternative version of Genesis, had Adam wait forty days from his creation until he could enter Eden,

and Eve eighty days, since both applied to Eden the temple laws about impurity after childbirth

(Jub.3.8-14). When Adam was leaving Eden, he burned an incense very like the one prescribed for

use only in the tabernacle (Exod.30.34-38): frankincense, galbabum, stacte and sweet spices

(Jub.3.27). Noah knew that the garden of Eden was the holy of holies, and the dwelling of the L

ORD



4



(Jub. 8.19). It is sometimes said that Jubilees reworked Genesis in order to make the link between

Eden and the temple, but this is unlikely, since the temple-as-Eden tradition was older than Genesis.

Another Adam and Eve text known at that time was the

Apocalypse of Moses. After Adam himself



had opened the door of paradise ,allowed the serpent to enter, and listened to his words, he grieved

for his folly. He had lost his garment of glory, the righteousness with which he had been clothed

(

Apocalypse of Moses 20-1-2). This is consistent with his role as high priest, since the vestments of



any high priest were described as a garments of glory: ‘holy garments for Aaron... for glory and for

beauty’ (Exod.28.2); and when Enoch stood before the heavenly throne, he was given garments of

God’s glory (

2 Enoch 22.6-10). St Ephrem, writing in fourth century Syria, said that God had



clothed Adam with glory (Ephrem,

Commentary on Genesis 2), and a collection of legendary



material from the same area said ‘Adam and Eve were in Paradise, clothed with glory and shining

with praise for three hours’ (

Book of the Cave of Treasures, I). The Genesis storyteller said that



Adam and Eve knew they were naked when they had taken and eaten the forbidden fruit, but did not

say what garment they had lost. Presumably the original hearers knew they had lost the high priestly

garment of glory when they listened to the snake. The community at Qumran hoped to regain ‘all

the glory of Adam... the knowledge of the Most High... the wisdom of the sons of heaven.’

(

Community Rule IV).



Adam’s garment of glory was woven by Wisdom, and Adam was proverbially wise. Eliphaz asked

Job: ‘Are you the first man that was born?... Have you listened in the council of God? And do you

limit wisdom to yourself?’ (Job 15.7-8). Ben Sira, writing in the second century BCE linked the high

priest’s vestments and Wisdom. When he was advising his son to accept the discipline of Wisdom,

he compared this to putting on the vestments of the high priest: ‘There is a golden ornament upon

her, and her bonds are a blue cord. You will wear her as a garment of glory, and put her on as a

crown of gladness ‘ (Ben Sira 6.30-31, my translation). This passed into Christian teaching. An

early Christian Wisdom text found in Egypt had Wisdom speaking to her children: ‘I am giving you

a high-priestly garment woven from every wisdom... clothe yourself with wisdom like a robe... be

seated on a throne of perception... return to your divine nature..’ (

Teaching of Silvanus CG VII.4.89,



91). The Gospel of Thomas attributes to Jesus a longer version of a saying in Matthew and Luke,

which suggests that Jesus was speaking of this robe of glory and wisdom. ‘Jesus said “Why have

you come out into the desert? To see a reed shaken by the wind? And to see a man clothed in fine

garments like your kings and your great men? Upon them are the fine garments, and yet they are

unable to discern the truth.”’ (

Gospel of Thomas 78).



Now Adam wearing fine garments of wisdom and sitting on a throne is not the figure we imagine in

Genesis, but such stories were known in the time of Jesus and, it would seem, to the writers of the

Hebrew Bible. The

Life of Adam and Eve is, in effect, the background to the Genesis story. It



describes how Satan was driven from heaven and vowed revenge on Adam who had caused his

downfall, [and this is the Adam story that appears in the Qur’an]. When Adam was created as the

image of the L

ORD God, all the angels were commanded to worship him, but Satan refused. He had



been created with the angels, he said, and so was prior to Adam in creation. Adam should worship

him. Satan and his angels were then expelled from heaven and plotted Adam’s downfall (

Life of



Adam and Eve


12-16).



5



This story is the context for the enigmatic words in Psalm 2. The L

ORD has set his king in Zion and



called him his son, and the kings and rulers are commanded to serve him: ‘Kiss the Son, lest he be

angy and you perish...’ (Ps.2.12). The king in Zion is the Adam figure, the image of God enthroned

in Zion. The angels called to worship Adam is also the setting for Deuteronomy 32.43, which

became a key proof text for the early Church: ‘When he brings the Firstborn into the world, he says

“Let all God’s angels worship him”’ (Heb.1.6). Jesus is the second Adam enthroned as the Son and

the angels have to worship him. Remember, Luke’s genealogy of Jesus describes Adam as the son

of God (Lk.3.38). The story of Satan refusing to worship Adam is also the context for Jesus’

temptations in the wilderness. Since Jesus was alone at that time, these must have been his own

accounts of the experience, and they are told in terms of this story: ‘If you are the Son of God...’. and

then most telling of all, the words of the devil: ‘If you will worship me, [the kingdoms of the world]

shall be yours’ (Lk.4.7). The second Adam was being asked to worship Satan, to reverse Satan’s

ancient humiliation. Mark summarised the same wilderness experience differently: ‘[Jesus] was with

the beasts and the angels served him’ (Mk.1.13). This means that in his wilderness visions, Jesus

was in the holy of holies with the beasts that formed the heavenly throne [the ‘living creatures’], and

the angels served him. This is the same story of Adam the image being worshipped, and is the vision

St John described in Revelation 5. It also appears in the description of the image of the beast who,

like Adam, was given breath and the power of speech, and then those who would not worship the

image of the beast were killed (Rev.13.15).

It is possible that all the stories known only in later texts were spun from the gaps and allusions in

the Genesis story, and the Eden temple of the

Book of Jubilees was a late fabrication. It is also



possible that the Adam and Eden and temple material is far older than Genesis 2-3, and that

traditions surfacing in later texts were themselves ancient, known to Ezekiel and either assumed by,

or omitted from, Genesis.

The accounts of Ezekiel’s visions of the chariot throne leaving the temple and going to Babylon,

with their mixture of masculine and feminine forms, singular and plural, are almost impossible to

translate. This is what we should expect of the male-and-female-Adam in the heavenly state.

Ezekiel saw ‘on the heavenly form of the throne, a heavenly form as the appearance of Adam,’

(Ezek.1.26, translating literally) which he recognised as ‘the appearance of the heavenly form of the

glory of Yahweh’ (Ezek.1.28). Adam enthroned was leaving the temple. Ezekiel spoke of ‘forms’

and ‘appearances’, mysterious words for us, but for a first temple priest they were probably technical

terms. The word translated ‘form’ seems to mean a heavenly archetype, and the word translated

‘appearance’ seems to mean its manifestation in a visible but not material form. Later teachers

would say that sin made it impossible for Adam to see his form, that is, to know his true self and his

true potential. ‘Because of sin, it was not given for man to know the

demut on high; were it not for



this sin, all the keys would be given to him and he would know how the heavens and the earth were

created...’ (

Abot de R Nathan, A39).



Similar ideas are found in the Qumran

Songs of the Sabbath Sacrifice, which also describe the



heavenly throne and entourage that Ezekiel saw, but there is a different word here for the invisible

realities, the forms. It is the word

ÅŸur. The Songs describe the ‘forms’ of living ’elohim, and the



‘forms’ of luminous spirits (4Q405). In the Old Testament, this same word is often found in

descriptions of God, but is translated as ‘Rock’ since that the same Hebrew letters can also mean



6



Rock. ‘The Rock, his work is perfect’ (Deut.32.4); ‘He scoffed at the Rock of his

salvation’(Deut.32.15); ‘The Rock of Israel has spoken to me’ (2 Sam.23.3); ‘O L

ORD... O Rock...’



(Hab.1.12). In none of these examples does the L

XX have the word ‘rock’, and there are many



examples where the Rock becomes simply ‘God’. In other words,

ÅŸur which means the ‘invisible



form’ in the

Songs of the Sabbath Sacrifice probably meant that in many other places in the Hebrew



Bible.

But how is this relevant to Adam? In Ezekiel’s Eden there was a bejewelled high priest figure who

was thrown out of the mountain-top garden of the gods. He was addressed as the King of Tyre.

Now why should the translator of the L

XX describe this figure as a temple high priest with all his



jewels if he was the King of Tyre? The answer may lie in the fact that the Hebrew for ‘Tyre’ is

written in the same way as the word that can mean ‘Rock’ or ‘invisible heavenly form’. The King of

Tyre, I suggest, was originally the heavenly ‘form’ of the king in Jerusalem, who had also been the

high priest after the order of Melchizedek (Ps.110.4). His expulsion from the city and temple was

described as Adam, the image of God, being expelled from Eden, or, in the case of Ezekel’s visions

of the throne, Adam, the appearance of the heavenly reality of the L

ORD, leaving the temple.



The charges against Ezekiel’s fallen high priest figure resemble the words to unfallen Adam in

Genesis who was created as the image, according to the ‘form’ of God - the same word as Ezekiel

used for the invisible reality. In his glorious unfallen state and vested, we assume, in his garment of

glory and wisdom, Adam was told to be fruitful and multiply and fill the earth (Gen.1.28). But these

words can have other meanings, and I suggest that they were originally understood to mean: ‘Be

beautiful and great, and fill the earth with glory’

1. In the time of Jesus, Adam was described as very



tall and beautiful: ‘a man very great in height, and terrible in breadth, incomparable in aspect’

(

Apocalyspe of Abraham 23.5), and later Jewish teachers said that in the time of the Messiah,



everything Adam had lost would be restored: his lustre, his immortality, his height..... (

Genesis



Rabbah


XII.6). There is nothing in Genesis, as we now read it, to suggest that Adam was tall and



radiant, but the words translated ‘be fruitful and multiply and fill the earth’ can have this other

meaning.

The Genesis Adam was also commanded to subdue,

kbš, the earth and have dominion, rdh. Now kbš



usually means ‘subdue’ (e.g Num.32.22; Jer.34.11), but Micah 7.18-19 suggests another possibility.

The context here is atonement, and the L

ORD has compassion and *** our iniquities. The verb is



translated ‘subdue’ [AV], ‘tread under foot’ [ RSV], but the atonement process was one of repairing

the bonds of the eternal covenant, and so ‘binding up’ our iniquities would better fit the context.

Since Adam was the high priest, this would have been his great work of atonement, of upholding the

eternal covenant and binding all things together. His second duty,

rdh, would then follow. ‘Have



dominion’ should be understood in the way it was used of Solomon: he ruled, he had dominion, and

he had peace on all sides (1 Kgs.4.21.24).

Ezekiel’s jewelled figure in the garden of the gods had corrupted all the characteristics of the original

Adam. Like the original Adam it was male-and-female, and in this passage, as in the visions of the

throne, ther is a mixture of masculine and feminine forms. Originally the jewelled figure had been



1


Parah, be fruitful, pa’ar, be beautiful; rabah, be great, ,



7



perfect in beauty and full of wisdom, just as Adam had been beautiful and wise, but the jewelled

figure had corrupted its wisdom and become proud through its beauty. Instead of filling the earth

with glory or wisdom, it had filled the earth with violence, and instead of being great, it had achieved

only greatness in commerce. The difficult command to Adam, ‘subdue’, which I suggest meant

‘bind things together’ appears in Ezekiel’s description of the jewelled figure as ‘You were the

seal of



perfection’.

The Genesis Adam was set in the garden and told that he could eat the fruit of any tree except the

tree of the knowledge of good and evil. Adam’s first disobedience was not simply an act of defiance

or stupidity; it concerned the attitude to knowledge. Adam was intended to eat from the tree of life

which was the symbol of Wisdom (Prov.3.18), but instead the human pair listened to the voice of the

snake and ate from the forbidden tree. Immediately they realised they were naked because they had

lost their garments of wisdom. You will recall that the Qumran community hoped to regain ‘all the

glory of Adam....’ which was ‘the knowledge of the Most High... the wisdom of the sons of heaven’;

and Ezekiel’s jewelled figure was thrown down from the mountain garden of the gods because it had

corrupted its wisdom and become proud.

Who, then, was the snake? A bronze snake had been part of the cult in Jerusalem until Hezekiah

destroyed it, and the words of the snake were in fact the promise to those who ate from the tree of

life. ‘Your eyes will be opened and you will be like the

’elohim’ (Gen. 3.5). But Wisdom did open



the eyes of those who fed on her, and she did make her children sons of God. This was symbolised

by temple anointing, since the perfumed oil represented the oil of the tree of life, and thre high priest

was anointed on his eyelids.

But who was the snake? I suspect that this was Satan’s first act of deception, taking the form of the

symbol of Wisdom, the bronze snake that Hezekiah destroyed. The snake suggested that both trees

were identical and had identical effects. The Genesis story of Adan and the garden of Eden marks

the point in Israel’s religion when Wisdom was rejected by the temple priesthood. Adam, the high

priest, chose the knowledge of good and evil rather than wisdom, and Ezekiel’s jewelled figure

corrupted its wisdom. They were driven from the garden. Those who remained faithful to Wisdom

said that she was rejected at this time, and that the eyes of the temple priests lost their sight. (

1 Enoch



93.8).

There are many echoes of the story of Adam leaving the garden that was the temple. Before he

sinned, when he was still in the garden, he could hear the song of the seraphim singing ‘Holy Holy

Holy’ (

Testament of Adam 1.4, a mid-3rd century Christian text), the seraphim that Isaiah had heard



in the holy of holies. When he left the garden, he took with him gold, frankincense and myrrh to

remind him of the garden, the temple, that he had lost, and these were buried with him (

Testament of



Adam


3.6). The magi bringing them as gifts to Jesus is the first sign in the New Testament of the

new Adam.

....

Taken from: http://www.templestudiesgroup.com/Barker_TheParadisaicTemple.pdf

Did Adam write the account of the Creation of Eve, the Fall and his sons Cain and Abel?



Did Adam write the account of the Creation of Eve, the Fall and his sons Cain and Abel? The Origin of Genesis. From the Evangelical Catholic Study Bible:

 
Scripture
QUESTIONS and INSIGHTS!

Genesis 5:1 THIS is The Book [literally: “written narrative” (inscribed tablet)]* of The Histories* of Adam. In the day that God [Elohim]*created man, He made him in the likeness of God. 2 He created them male and female and blessed them and called their name Adam, in the day when they were created.


*The Book (inscribed tablet): Besides the fact that Peter confidently asserts there were prophets and their witness to the truth “from the very beginning of the world”(Acts 3:21), the Hebrew word sepher here means “written narrative,” and is so translated by F. Delitzsch. Despite this, most in the field of “Biblical scholarship” from the mid 1800’s into the 20th century, recklessly ignoring this Biblical evidence of writing from the very earliest human civilization, spun an entire system of Biblical criticism by which they rendered everything in the five books of Moses as a patchwork of much later written renditions of myths and stories that had evolved over the many centuries by word of mouth. When solid extra-Biblical evidence proved the scholars were dead wrong, it was such an embarrassment that most simply ignored the evidence and went on their way continuing to peddle their outdated notions. This written record of Adam (Ch. 3-5:1) could have been completed as early as 3500 BC. P. J. Wiseman cites examples of original writings discovered in Egypt to be from 3000 BC, and perhaps the oldest known stone document dating to 3300 BC used a “line picture” form that predates cuneiform. New Discoveries, p. 35-36. For an understandable but scholarly review of Wiseman, see: www.specialtyinterests.net/Toledoth Next evidence of one Sacred Canon: Exodus 1:1; 17:14; and Joshua 24:26

*histories: See the Introduction to Genesis.

*Elohim: Note that when Adam speaks of God the Creator, before the Covenant with man, he does not use Jehovah (Lord), but Elohim (God). These accounts in Genesis are not stories written later by groups who had different names for God, as the liberal scholars continue to maintain!

From the Introduction to Genesis in the Evangelical Catholic Study Bible:

The origin and authorship of Genesis: The British scholar P. J. Wiseman, C.B.E., in his New Discoveries in Babylonia about Genesis, thoroughly demolishes the old liberal modernist view of the late origins of Genesis and the JEDP “documentary theory” of the Graf-Wellhausen school of “higher criticism,” and offers conclusive evidence that Genesis is a collection of histories written by those who actually lived the events beginning with Adam himself. Wiseman proves that the phrase, “These are the generations of . . .” found throughout the book, denotes the personal history of the one so named, and is not an introductory but a concluding identification to the particular document. This collection called Genesis thus includes not only the personal written records of Adam, Noah, Shem, Terah, Isaac, Jacob and Esau and Moses, but a written record of creation from Elohim/God Himself left to Adam after his creation. Indeed, the Lord God Himself gave witness to Isaiah of this very record made at the very beginning of creation: “Come near unto Me, and hear this: I have not spoken in secret from the beginning [but plainly and openly]; from the time before it was done [the founding of the earth] I was there” (Isaiah 48:16).
Peter affirms that Adam wrote the part of Genesis in which is found the redemption text of 3:15-16 (Acts 3:21). That he was the author of Genesis 2:23 ... was a common belief in Jesus’ day. This means Adam, who states in 5:1 that what had preceded was his own personal written history, was a very real person with superior intelligence and with the skill and knowledge to understand and communicate. The inscription, “These are the histories of the heavens and the earth,” closing out chapter one, clearly distinguishing this from the following history of Adam, means this record came directly from the Creator and probably in the same form in which Moses received the Ten Commandments. Evidence also reveals that this entire collection of documents was handed down to Moses on a sequentially “numbered” series of clay tablets from which Moses compiled it in its present form and for which he has from the beginning rightly been given credit. A convincing scholarly summary of Wiseman’s significant research by Damien F. Mackey of the California Institute for Ancient Studies can be found at www.specialtyinterests.net/Toledot . On the uncertainty of radiocarbon dating beyond 3,000 years, by which anthropologists have attempted to determine the antiquity of man apart from the Biblical record see:
www.answersingenesis.org/articles/nab/does-c14-disprove-the-bible The Chronology of Genesis chapter five and the time of Adam’s creation have been discussed in the Introduction to this Study Bible.

....



Taken from: http://www.newamplifieddouayrheims.com/blog/did-adam-write-the-account-of-the-creation-of-eve-the-fall-and-his-sons-cain-and-able/

Monday, September 9, 2013

Moses As Primary Author of Book of Exodus



Exodus

 


Introduction to Exodus

Exodus is the first book of the Pentateuch actually written by Moses (see “Introduction” to Genesis). The latter part of Genesis was probably written by the sons of Jacob, beginning after Jacob’s signature at Genesis 37:2. Moses then seems to have tied the beginning of Exodus to the end of Genesis by a formula similar–though slightly different, using the word “names” instead of “generations”–to the other toledoth (listing of generations) sections in Genesis.

The book of Exodus describes in detail the real beginnings of Israel as a nation, under the leadership of Moses. The high points are the miraculous deliverance of the Israelites from Egypt and the giving of the law on Mount Sinai. These and other events in Exodus are frequently referred to in later parts of the Bible, both Old and New Testaments, and all references clearly note Moses as author. There is no doubt whatever that all later generations of Israelites were confident that Moses was the writer of the Pentateuch until the development of the J, E, D, P theory in the 19th century. Ever since the rise of “higher criticism,” under the leadership of Julius Wellhausen and other scholars in Germany, together with the simultaneous spread of Darwinian evolutionism in England, practically all the liberal theologians in every country and every denomination have rejected the Mosaic authorship of the Pentateuch. In spite of all the evidence, they continue teaching that these books were not written until many centuries after Moses.

It is significant that, among those scholars who reject the Mosaic authorship of the Pentateuch–Exodus in particular–there is no consensus as to who did write it, even among those who accept some form of the documentary hypothesis. For the Christian, the matter is settled by the fact that Jesus Christ recognized Moses as the author of Exodus (see, e.g., Mark 12:26, quoting from Exodus 3:6). The Pentateuch itself often says that Moses wrote down the accounts of the events described therein. The first such instance is in Exodus 17:14 (see also Exodus 24:4; 34:27; etc.).

The main reason why liberal scholars rejected the Mosaic authorship–the ostensible reason, that is (the real reason is their naturalistic commitment to evolutionism)–is their assumption that Moses did not know how to write in that supposed early time of man’s cultural evolution. However, every knowledgeable scholar today knows that such an assumption was absurd. An abundance of archaeological research in the nations of the Near East has shown beyond any question that everyone, commoner as well as scholar, knew how to write in all those nations long before Moses’ time. Yet these liberal theologians and other scholars continue to reject Moses’ authorship.

Also, many evolutionary archaeologists today reject the historicity of Exodus altogether, reasoning that none of the writings of Egypt and other Near East nations confirm the events of Exodus (the plagues in Egypt, the destruction of Pharaoh’s army in the Red Sea, the wanderings of two million or more Israelites in the Sinai wilderness for forty years). However, the Mosaic authorship of the Pentateuch and the historical accuracy of its record are fully accepted by later writers of both Old and New Testaments, and these writers certainly had better access to the facts involved than skeptics coming twenty centuries later would have.

Correlation with archaeology may await further discoveries, especially in respect to the chronologies involved. Both radiocarbon dating and pottery dating are subject to many uncertainties, and the same is true of the transmitted Biblical text in some instances, especially in the accurate reproduction of numbers which might influence Biblical chronological calculations. We may be confident, in view of the wealth of internal evidence, that all these external questions will eventually be resolved in favor of the tradition of Mosaic authorship and historical accuracy of the entire Pentateuch.

....

Taken from: http://www.icr.org/books/defenders/582/